Jochem van Dieten wrote:
[..]
Code to wrap lines using a loop and Insert() was significantly slower on
CF MX as CF 5. Complete thread can be found in the archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=messagesthreadid=14563forumid=4
[..]
The numbers:
CF 5
CF 5MX JRE 1.3MX JRE 1.4
9 KB405060
24 KB 240 3300 7000
84 KB 670013174000
ah that would explain my sucky numbers for cfmx. ah, let them eat i18n
cake ;-)
---
Outgoing mail is certified
Joe Eugene wrote:
I noticed on my Dev box... when you open server docs...
http://127.0.0.1/cfdocs/dochome.htm
Does this have anything to do with the JRE... Docs say
Note: The search dialog works with the J2SE 1.4.0 JRE, J2SE 1.3.1_02 JRE,
and J2SE1.3.1_03 JRE, and with the corresponding SDKs
mark brinkworth wrote:
Was the page encoding the same for both? I would suspect that putting
cfprocessingdirective pageencoding = UTF-8
on the CFMX page would speed it up.
Makes a difference of maybe a few percent (in the wrong way actually),
while we're talking a performance
Paul Hastings wrote:
just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm
using 1.4 for its improved i18n stuff) if any patches were applied to
either version.
Was running:
JVM Details
Java Version 1.3.1_03
Java VendorSun
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX CF 4.5
trusted cache no trusted cache
On my dev server, it takes 1232 ms for a 29k file.
My devserver is CFMX / WinNT/ 800 Cellaron w/ 128 megs
At 09:16 PM 30/07/02 +0200, you wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at
21k IIS log file
CF MX
P3 500
No Trusted Cache
1172 ms
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX performance issue
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF
I hit refresh and got 611 ms
Refresh again 1302 ms
Ditto 601 ms
Ditto 601 ms
Ditto 1362 ms
What is up with that?
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX performance issue
21k IIS log file
CF MX
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
I don't have anything
Are you keeping a list Sean?
At 12:41 PM 30/07/02 -0700, you wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight
Enter a bug.
Ok, yeah, that was cheap.
Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux special guy
-Original Message-
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue
CFMX OSX PPC G4 800 MHz 512 Meg RAM
Lots of other stuff running concurrently (IE, BBEdit, Mail Client,
Sherlock, OpenBase db server)
All standard (Default) Linux install ported to Mac -- no non-default
admin settings
291-321 ms on 25K file
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Brook
same setup 2089-2741 with a 53K file (an O'Reilly article html file)
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Dick Applebaum wrote:
CFMX OSX PPC G4 800 MHz 512 Meg RAM
Lots of other stuff running concurrently (IE, BBEdit, Mail Client,
Sherlock, OpenBase db server)
All standard (Default)
Sean
I don't understand why yours is so much slower than mine -- maybe we
need a consistent file to work with
Dick
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:41 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine
CF 4.5
p 500 128MB RAM
no trusted cache
debugging off
540 ms
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX
Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0
File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb)
Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat)
Results:
1) 1000
2) 1076
3) 1078
Dave Deeds
Idaho Power Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21k IIS log file
CF 4.5.1
300MHz Celeron
Debugging on
531-541 ms
21k IIS log file (same file as above)
CF MX
P3 500
No Trusted Cache
1172 ms
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX
Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac
277-299
did not close browser -- just reloaded page
But now we have a consistent file.
Dick
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Deeds, Dave wrote:
Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0
File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference,
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:02 , Brook Davies wrote:
Are you keeping a list Sean?
Not my job :)
I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and
800ms
(regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with
512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file.
I picked
I need to go run some errands -- can't wait to get back, though--
this has been a interesting and pleasant diversion
Dick
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:27 PM, Dick Applebaum wrote:
Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac
277-299
did not close browser -- just reloaded page
But now we have a
CF 4.5
p 500 128MB RAM
no trusted cache
debugging off
540 ms
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue
Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac
277-299
did not close browser -- just reloaded page
But now we have a consistent file.
Dick
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Deeds, Dave wrote:
Setup is quad
Hmmm, that server loaded?
I just tested a 2x 1Ghz P3 512MB Wink SP2 CFMX, nothing running on it.
Same file and it is pretty consistent at 437ms after first run.
I recopied Jochem's code to make sure I didn't change it. The results
stay the same.
--
Jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, July
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
To be absolutely sure I installed CF 5 on the same
On 800MHZ G4 CFMX i got
9 KB 27-41
24 KB 708-1347
84 KB 60111-60780
Are you guys running the browser, etc on the same box (I am) or just
measuring a box running CFMX JRun and a Web Server?
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 02:10 PM, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX performance issue
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit
: CF MX performance issue
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX CF 4.5
trusted cache
just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm
using 1.4 for its improved i18n stuff) if any patches were applied to
either version.
patched cfmx
no cache, debugging on
jre 1.4
win2k sp2
dual pIII 1gb ram
85kb frontpage produced tag fest
6103-6740ms (20 runs)
the latest J2SE...docs ran faster.. but system slowed..
Any Ideas?
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue
just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE
30 matches
Mail list logo
