Picky picky...
The point was that IIS doesn't process the file - CF does.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Sheldon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryp
> Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser
> sight unseen"
>
> IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or
> has been told to check for the file's existence before handing
> the request off. (Even then it does not actually open the file,
> it just looks for it.)
> So here is a question:
> CF is running under a service account - that has permissions
> across the network.
>
> If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account
> - won't the system have access to it then???
No, it won't. The Local System security context isn't a user account, per
s
> It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's
> the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser
> sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it
> look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl,
> Tango, what have you.
>
> MS would need to bu
f page hits.
The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption
anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednes
to use that form of encryption
anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM
Subject: CF4.5 doesn't
http://www.desertraven.com/
PGP Key Available on Request
-Original Message-
From: Pecora, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 12:48
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
So here is a question:
CF is run
It should but are you logged in as administrator? The services
use the System account. I don't know how to impersonate that account
using a login...
>So here is a question:
>CF is running under a service account - that has permissions across teh
>network.
>
>If the file in Question is encrypted u
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security
context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless
you specify that you want them to r
But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security
context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless
you specify that you want them to run under a different one.
Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to
have the CF service "impersonate"
> first off, i have cf-talk set to send "plain text only", so if any
> attachments are being sent, that's news to me. granted i'll figure out why
> outlook is still sending them, but no need to give a speech like i haven't
> been reading this list forever and a day.
Wow. That's a pretty rude resp
't going to bother making a new one".
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
&g
> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I
> would think
> that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner
> (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run
> under the
> context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as t
nd ideas come out of this list
than to get replies like that...
mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 4:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
;
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM
>Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
>
>
> > This is a multi-p
At 02:10 PM 3/29/00 -0800, you wrote:
>On the other hand, who says that they all have problems with it? Maybe only
>Cold Fusion does. Unless someone's tried them all, I don't think you can say
>one way or the other who's problem it is, but I do think that Allaire is the
>ones who would need to fix
ot;Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
> Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect
CF,
> Perl, Rebol and a
ECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
> Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect
CF,
> Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you
think
> it ne
sages.
Thanks,
Rey...
Certified Allaire Instructor
Member of Team Allaire
"A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*."
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed
Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF,
Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think
it needs a fix from Allaire?
>
> Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to
> support this, as I get the following erro
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to
support this, as I get the following error on any
21 matches
Mail list logo
