-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc :
> Data: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:00:17 +0200
> Assunto : Re: CFHTTP, security hole?
>
> Alex Hubner wrote:
> >
> > Pull_action.cfm (on my remote server):
> > _
> > > URL="http://www.
Alex Hubner wrote:
> Yea, I've read about this problem with CFPOP somewhere... Spooky!
>
> Anyway, is more than clear that now CFMX is the choice for hosting
> providers.
In this area little changes with CF MX. Sandbox Security still requires
Enterprise edition with CF MX. And it was always po
en <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc :
> Data: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 22:36:33 +0200
> Assunto : Re: CFHTTP, security hole?
>
> Alex Hubner wrote:
> > Yea, I've read about this problem with CFPOP somewhere... Spooky!
>
quot;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: CFHTTP, security hole?
> Yea, I've read about this problem with CFPOP somewhere... Spooky!
>
> Anyway, is more than clear that now CFMX is the choice for hosting
> provide
Neil H. wrote:
> Anyone not running advanced security on CFMX in a hosting environment isn't
> bright. They couldn't have made it any easer. At www.HostMySite.com we run
> advanced and it works very well.
Maybe you can confirm or deny the cfpop & cfhttp issues.
Jochem
s very well.
>
> Neil
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 4:13 PM
> Subject: Re: CFHTTP, security hole?
>
>
> > Yea, I
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: CFHTTP, security hole?
> I deeply agree but, as we know, not everything is perfect... I saw
> people ru
7 matches
Mail list logo
