Hey Michael. I've been using Wheels for about a year now and absolutely love
it. I didn't use any official framework before Wheels and found It really
easy to get setup and start building with.
Wheels made MVC style development really easy for me and has some of the best
documentation
Hey Michael. I've been using Wheels for about a year now and absolutely love
it. I didn't use any official framework before Wheels and found It really
easy to get setup and starting building with.
Wheels made MVC style development really easy for me and has some of the best
documentation
Brian,
Thank you. Love your input regarding CFWheels. I think thats the first one
regarding its ORM. Never tried Hiberante, but now I think I keep it to
Model-Glue, CFWheels, and FW/1. Good point about having CF8 and higher. I
might want to think about using another for ColdFusion 7 because
Hi all,
Wondering if anybody has any experiences, positive or negative with using CF
Wheels and/or Model-Glue. Perhaps you have some advice to share on proper
techniques etc etc. PLEASE LET US NOT MAKE THIS A WHICH FRAMEWORK IS BETTER,
because I am looking at possibly using both of them in
Well,
To be honest you're coming at it a little backwards. Which one you would use
depends on what you're planning on building and what you hope to get out of
a framework.
This is like asking if you should buy a truck or a boat. The answer is
always going to be, it depends.
So start with What
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only used for
medium sized apps (aka not ten page websites or enterprise level). I stated
Model-Glue because I have used it on a enterprise level, so in fact my question
on that end has already been answered.
As to the learning
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only used
for medium sized apps (aka not ten page websites or enterprise
level).
CFWheels is basically a Rails implementation for CF, so if you like
the things Rails brings to the table (ActiveRecord, rapid prototyping,
etc) it
FW/1 you say? I will definitely check it out. Never know, that might be the
one. I have to be honest in that I know almost knowing about Rails because my
last position was as a SQL DBA and was like out of the loop for a while and
that might be a good thing because I don't know any better
FW/1 you say?
+1 for FW/1. It is a joy to use.
G!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Michael Firth mfsqlser...@gmail.comwrote:
FW/1 you say? I will definitely check it out. Never know, that might be
the one. I have to be honest in that I know almost knowing about Rails
because my last
I also second Daves recommendation about checking out FW/1, its very light
weight, very easy to learn, and IMHO hits the sweet spot.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
Actually, CFWheels states in its documentation that it should be only
used for medium
Agreed. I did the download from RIA and probably will give it a test spin
perhaps tomorrow. Thanks for the info all.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:21 PM, John Allen wrote:
I also second Daves recommendation about checking out FW/1, its very light
weight, very easy to learn, and IMHO hits the
11 matches
Mail list logo
