RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jack Poe
gawd, IIS blows! I used to use Deerfield Website but Red Sky won't work with it is Apache any better? Or is there another solution? -Original Message- From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jack Poe wrote: You're kidding!!! Leave it to Microsoft to put the stranglehold on me maybe I can get Deerfield to cough up a new CFMX connector I don't think that would help with the number of concurrent TCP/IP connections. You might have more luck with something like timing them out

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Marlon Moyer
Since you're on Win2K pro, I'm assuming you have the 1 site version of IIS, if that's the case and you have more than 1 site (ie, you access the site by something like 127.0.0.1/cfdayton/) it might be an issue of absolute image paths, meaning that your image paths look like this:

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jack Poe wrote: great - I'd have to un-install CFMX again? that's three times today...g Do you use IIS functionality? Why not just shut down IIS and have the CF MX build in webserver run on port 80? Jochem ~|

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jack Poe
] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question I have a development instance of a site that's running under a Developer License of MX using the internal server. I upgraded it to 6.1 this morning and though the initial server start seemed to take longer than MX

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jack Poe
great - I'd have to un-install CFMX again? that's three times today...g -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Cheesy IIS question -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten

Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jack Poe
BlankWhy oh why am I seeing broken images when I visit a site from the machine it is being hosted onin IIS 5.0 on Win2000 Pro The offending site is www.cfdayton.com _ Jack L. Poe Manager Greater Dayton ColdFusion User Group www.cfdayton.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jack Poe wrote: BlankWhy oh why am I seeing broken images when I visit a site from the machine it is being hosted onin IIS 5.0 on Win2000 Pro The offending site is www.cfdayton.com I got the following error: The page cannot be displayed There are too many people accessing the Web site

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-14 Thread Jim Campbell
kidding!!! Leave it to Microsoft to put the stranglehold on me maybe I can get Deerfield to cough up a new CFMX connector thanks! -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question Jack

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-10 Thread Jim Campbell
-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question Jack Poe wrote: great - I'd have to un-install CFMX again? that's three times today...g Do you use IIS functionality? Why not just shut down IIS and have the CF MX build in webserver run on port 80? Jochem

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-09 Thread Jack Poe
, August 05, 2003 4:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question Is Linux/Apache not an option? I don't know how familiar you are with it, but it's not *that* difficult to set up a webserver from scratch, especially with a friendly installer like SuSE or Mandrake, and you won't be restricted

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-06 Thread Dave Watts
Why oh why am I seeing broken images when I visit a site from the machine it is being hosted onin IIS 5.0 on Win2000 Pro The offending site is www.cfdayton.com My guess is that you're not preloading all the images you're using for your image rollovers. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-06 Thread Douglas.Knudsen
-Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question Jochem van Dieten wrote: Jack Poe wrote: You're kidding!!! Leave it to Microsoft to put the stranglehold on me maybe I can get

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-05 Thread Jack Poe
is the 6.1 built-in server better than the last version? It was slow as molasses -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS question Jack Poe wrote: great - I'd have to un-install

RE: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-05 Thread Jack Poe
You're kidding!!! Leave it to Microsoft to put the stranglehold on me maybe I can get Deerfield to cough up a new CFMX connector thanks! -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cheesy IIS

Re: Cheesy IIS question

2003-08-05 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jochem van Dieten wrote: Jack Poe wrote: You're kidding!!! Leave it to Microsoft to put the stranglehold on me maybe I can get Deerfield to cough up a new CFMX connector I don't think that would help with the number of concurrent TCP/IP connections. You might have more luck with