e is truly compliant).
-Original Message-
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Trusz@;ssa.gov]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Your examples suggest that the problem isn't with Lynx but with screen
readers. Lynx cleanly separates f
ce, Jochem seems right. Lynx delivers content. So, Jaws
over Lynx?
>Speech ready Lynx?
>
>drew
>-Original Message-
>From: Sandy Clark [mailto:slLists@;shayna.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:52 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
>
&
ovember 07, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Not necessarily the specific portions. It might even comply legally,
but that doesn't meant that it would be easily readable in a screen
reader such as JAWS or Simply Web.
To give an example, use three programs.
All of these are great!
Thanks a lot :-)
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean@;corfield.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Carli
1:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
> all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comp
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Carlisle, Eric wrote:
>> Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
> Rule of the thumb:
> if it looks decent in Lynx and is valid HTML, it is compliant.
If only it were that simple! :)
Check out the Ac
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
> all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comply with then?
Jochem
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/
Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets all the
508 criteria.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:jochemd@;oli.tudelft.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:11 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT: Section
Carlisle, Eric wrote:
> Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
>
> I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that
> will make your site compliant.
>
> The only "badge" I've seen on Web sites is the "W3C WGAC" label...
> which is and isn't the same thi
Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that will make
your site compliant.
The only "badge" I've seen on Web sites is the "W3C WGAC" label... which is
and isn't the same thing.
I've also seen the "Bobby" badge
10 matches
Mail list logo
