quot;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
> I remember that! I spent almost a semester trying to figure out what CGI
> was, and he was the one who explained it to me!
>
> Anyone still have a copy of Bob Denny's
Bob's site is solo.dc3.com. He has some of his stuff on there...
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Haggerty, Michael A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
bSite.
Mike Brunt
Sempra Energy
213.244.5226
"A complex system that does not work is invariably found to have evolved
from a simpler system that worked just fine. "
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:09 AM
To:
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
Not only do I have copies of WS and WS pro, I've got emails from Bob and
some code he wrote to help me write a CFX for website security. As for
its current use, I've been using WS pro on HoF for y
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:52 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: OT: my own box
>
>
>> I used Website Pro version 1.0 in college, and I remember
>> getting some free server software for build
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
> I used Website Pro version 1.0 in college, and I remember
> getting some free server software for building dynamic Web
> pages along with it. The name sounded like something from
> a physics class
> Good call on the ref to Bob. :)
He taught me everything I know.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
__
Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40
You may be right about v1.1...
Good call on the ref to Bob. :)
DB
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
> I used Website Pro version 1.0 in college, and I remember
> gettin
last year -
when compared to its past performance (it has a ways to go however).
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
We ran Website Pro from January '96 (version 1.0) un
> I used Website Pro version 1.0 in college, and I remember
> getting some free server software for building dynamic Web
> pages along with it. The name sounded like something from
> a physics class, and the name of the company started with
> an 'A'...
If I recall correctly, Website Pro did n
ColdFusion shipped with Website Pro 1.0 on floppies. Website later
shipped with iHTML.
-Original Message-
From: Haggerty, Michael A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
I used Website Pro version 1.0 in college, and I
-
From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
We ran Website Pro from January '96 (version 1.0) until just over a year
ago then migrated to IIS on WIN2K.
Our main contention was, under heavy load, Website j
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: my own box
> > I'm wondering if anyone can share thoughts on installing
> > IIS
>
> My best advice is DON'T, if you can possibly help it. I
> personally dis
I agree with Dave entirely here (and I'm sure Dave just breated a huge sigh
of relief). Microsoft (and IIS as a result), because of its position in the
marketplace, is held to a higher level of scrutiny, and this, the flaws that
do exist are publicized with a level of glee at Slashdot and the lik
> > I'm wondering if anyone can share thoughts on installing
> > IIS
>
> My best advice is DON'T, if you can possibly help it. I
> personally disable IIS before my machines ever get connected
> to the Internet.
>
> Website Pro is the way to go. The time you'll save not having
> to spend chec
unday, March 10, 2002 7:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: my own box
On 3/10/02, Jason Davis penned:
>I'm about to start co-locating next month my own win2K server box.
>from installting, through service packs, hotfixes, sql server and all
that...
>
>I'm wondering if a
On 3/10/02, Jason Davis penned:
>I'm about to start co-locating next month my own win2K server box.
>from installting, through service packs, hotfixes, sql server and all that...
>
>I'm wondering if anyone can share thoughts on installing IIS
My best advice is DON'T, if you can possibly help it.
Burn the SP's to a CD and install everything, and remove all of the
unnecessary extensions, _before_ plugging in the network cable.
Otherwise I guaranteee you will get infected by Nimbda and all the rest
before you can even get IIS started. Removing the unnecessary IIS
extensions pretty much s
Jason Davis wrote:
> I'm about to start co-locating next month my own win2K server box.
> from installting, through service packs, hotfixes, sql server and all that...
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can share thoughts on installing IIS patches/hotfixes.
> I know that there are many of them, how do y
I'm about to start co-locating next month my own win2K server box.
from installting, through service packs, hotfixes, sql server and all that...
I'm wondering if anyone can share thoughts on installing IIS patches/hotfixes.
I know that there are many of them, how do you keep up?
any info would b
20 matches
Mail list logo
