RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-20 Thread Dave Watts
> A question I've had about Fusebox and security/stability. In > some enterprise sites I've dealt with I've found it a good > practice not to pass variables along the URL if possible. It > becomes very easy for someone to "break" the app by altering > URLs - something they actually have access

Re: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-20 Thread Sean Renet
> > that you post (e.g.., "If you can afford SQL Server, you can > > afford its own box"). Can you even believe that I am still harping on this? > In all honesty - today. This morning. I was reviewing a Fusebox application, > to fix some problems within that application. I'm familiar with the ba

RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Mark Warrick
The fuseactions are simply switches and are irrelevant to obvious security measures that should be taken regardless of the development platform or coding methodology. If the application is poorly written, it won't matter whether it's in the fusebox style or not. ---mark -

RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Jeremy Allen
If someone wants to produce erroneous results with your site they can as long as it only affects that user it is fine. Thats what the default fuseaction is for to catch any fuseactions not listed and handle them gracefully.. Modifying URL parameters if you code properly is not a problem since you

RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Cameron Childress
> as opposed to FORM variables, (or session & client vars, etc.). If > fuseactions are passed through the URL, doesn't this lead to the same > "instability"? Not really, as you should always have a specified for such occasions... -Cameron Cameron Childress ElliptIQ Inc. p

RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Jeremy Allen
First: Naughty naughty!!! I encountered the exact same scenario my main frameset had a frame to display people in a 'chat room' the left nav, the main frame is the main data display frame the command frame is where you type in stuff to send to the room, the 'socket frame' is the one that act

RE: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Dave Watts
Warning! This is a very long and verbose response. If you're not interested in the topic, ignore this message. Remember, I warned you! > You know, I think you guys at Figleaf set the standard for what > client interface should be and your applications are certainly > the goal of programmers eve

Re: [CF-Talk] RE: Ben Forta, I call on thee (was: What is Fusebox) -- Reply to Dave Watts.

2000-09-19 Thread Sean Renet
Dave, You know, I think you guys at Figleaf set the standard for what client interface should be and your applications are certainly the goal of programmers everywhere. I also like the thought process behind what you guys do. And I can't imagine there is anyone that does not appreciate all the