RE: failure? -- Answer

2002-01-15 Thread Brian Scandale
Docs are wrong... backwards actually. will be true for "rework" or "reworkloop" which was my intention. Thanks, Brian At 04:59 PM 1/15/02 -0500, you wrote: >Shouldn't this be reversed? I'd think the arguements should go the >other >way around... (Assuming you're looking for the word 'Rewo

RE: failure?

2002-01-15 Thread Dirk Sieber
Shouldn't this be reversed? I'd think the arguements should go the other way around... (Assuming you're looking for the word 'Rework' in Client.TravType, which seems to be what you're doing). Dirk > -Original Message- > From: Brian Scandale [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, J

RE: failure?

2002-01-15 Thread Dunwiddie, Bruce
in my way of phrasing things, I think the reference is wrong. the value on the left is the string to search, and the value on the right is the substring to search for. -Original Message- From: Brian Scandale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:59 PM To: CF-Talk S

RE: failure?

2002-01-15 Thread Brian Scandale
Sorry, Figured it out... is the correct syntax... Brian This tag does not seem to work like I would expect. Can anyone shed some light? Very little in the docs about this. I quote the only reference... "CONTAINS determines whether the value on the left is containe