ris Olive,
DOEHRS Website Administrator
-Original Message-
From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000
I will have to try that again, I have had 4.3pro and 97 together, but never
managed to ge
nt: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000
> that's actually incorrect. i am currently running both office versions.
> (at one point, i had 4.3 on there, too!)
>
> the key with microsoft is to install their products in DATE ORDER, oldest
> first. if yo
-
::From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
::Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:30 AM
::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000
::
::
::oops, Microsoft strike again :-)
::
::As far as I know there is NO way to get both versions running on the same
::machine (thanks Microsoft
istry and
things work smoothly.
Regards,
Marc Garrett
- Original Message -
From: "Gene Kraybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 2:32 PM
Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000
> I see Access 2000 has an option to save in Acce
he 2000 install, they'll play together nicely.
Chris Olive,
DOEHRS Website Administrator
-Original Message-
From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000
oops, Microsoft strike again :-)
As far a
Everland III
Web Developer
Dixon Ticonderoga
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:52 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000
A miracle
No really - I think you need to have them installed on
oops, Microsoft strike again :-)
As far as I know there is NO way to get both versions running on the same
machine (thanks Microsoft).
The error you are getting is a cracker, and you will have fun getting rid of
it! The problem is caused by the fact that Office 2000 does not completely
remove i
I see Access 2000 has an option to save in Access 97 format. Can anyone vouch for
this as a reliable way of maintaining Access-97 dbs on a development machine when
upgrading to 2000 isn't an option on the live server?
Gene Kraybill
Andy Ewings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think you need to have t
H, I have both installed without a problem. I had 97 installed first,
then installed 2000 from the disc and select the "install when first run"
option. I can switch back and forth and even have both running at once.
I have a Windows 98 OS, if that makes any difference.
-Deanna
***
shed, start Access.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:52 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000
A miracle
No really - I think you need
A miracle
No really - I think you need to have them installed on a seperate drive, or
partition - but I'm not 100% sure
-Original Message-
From: Gene Kraybill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 August 2000 18:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Access 97 and 2000
What does it ta
11 matches
Mail list logo
