st 04, 2003 9:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: An ISP's Dream: Extensions in one sandbox, client code in
another
Jochem and Michael,
Interesting ideas - thanks!
I think I have done a poor job of describing the scenario. Ben Forta's
"Maybe We Should Try a Separation" (CFDJ Vol 4 I
Blum, Jason (SAA) wrote:
>
> I think I have done a poor job of describing the scenario. Ben Forta's
> "Maybe We Should Try a Separation" (CFDJ Vol 4 Issue 10) really got me
> to thinking: there are so many good reasons for code reuse (faster
> development time, centralized ("policable") code, eas
I didn't read all the way back through the thread, but why is it
important that they use each others code in the first place? Obviously
code reuse is a good thing, but you never explained why it was
important for you. In most places...if the boss says, use this code,
it should to be used, and if no
ut
restrictions.
Think of the implications for users both novice and advanced, for the
administrators' responsibility to ensure a secure and available
environment!
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:35
Michael T. Tangorre wrote:
> Just plan for it... have two databases running on
> a server so when one is mangled you can switch to the other one and vice
> versa Now in a real world situation, resources are limited to some
> extent or should be anyway.
We have long since adopted the position t
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: An ISP's Dream: Extensions in one sandbox, client code in
another
> Blum, Jason (SAA) wrote:
> >
> > Suppose you do want all of your students to be able to experiment with
> > CFML. You w
Blum, Jason (SAA) wrote:
>
> Suppose you do want all of your students to be able to experiment with
> CFML. You want them to learn about SQL perhaps within the confines of
> QoQ.
No way. QoQ is an abomination. Why wouldn't I want them to use a
real database?
> But you know they come and go ev
al Message -
From: "Blum, Jason (SAA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:57 AM
Subject: RE: An ISP's Dream: Extensions in one sandbox, client code in
another
> Hey Jochem,
>
> Really appreciate your
my server, you get
bumped down to the novice group where you can only call custom tags...")
Am trying to think of better examples. Again, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: An
Blum, Jason (SAA) wrote:
>
> Yes, the CFEXECUTE was a bad example. Suppose instead you hosted all a
> University's various colleges' websites on one server.
Make that fraternities and student societies and I do :-)
> None of them had
> particularly good developers and instead of teaching them
do you keep the calling templates' sandbox restrictions from
extending to their use of your custom tag?
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 5:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: An ISP's Dream: Extensions in on
Blum, Jason (SAA) wrote:
>
> From an ISP's perspective, would it not be a God-send to put all clients
> in one big, heavily restricted sandbox (no datasources, etc.) and all
> datasource-accessing CFC's and other extensions in another sandbox to
> which only the ISP administrator has posting right
12 matches
Mail list logo
