At 02:41 AM 1/7/01 -0500, Dave Watts wrote:
>> [...] There is NO performance penalty over properly used manual read locking.[...]
>Are you sure there's no performance penalty? How much testing have you done
>on this? Or, are you relying on a test done by someone else? How accurate
>was that test?
> This is also the reason I have been ranting about Automatic
> Read locking on this list lately. It works. There is NO
> performance penalty over properly used manual read locking. I
> am sure the ONLY reason it isn't at least the default if not
> the ONLY choice is simply a legacy from older
2 matches
Mail list logo
