Dave Watts wrote:
While the website looks modern the most recent download is
1999 and the last news item in 2001 talks about the new site
openwddx.org opening.
So ... is this an old technology that is begin replaced by
a more mature XML environment?
Yes, it's quite old - it dates
We should, these days, add JSON to the mix. While not XML, it's
rapidly becoming the format of choice for AJAX.
On 7/29/07, Dave Watts wrote:
While the website looks modern the most recent download is
1999 and the last news item in 2001 talks about the new site
openwddx.org opening.
So
Dave Watts wrote:
Does that mean that the guy at the other end must be CF so
that it can use the CFWDDX tag to deserialize it, or ...
No, WDDX is just an XML language, so it can be deserialized by other
programs. There are (or were at least) WDDX libraries for several languages,
While the website looks modern the most recent download is
1999 and the last news item in 2001 talks about the new site
openwddx.org opening.
So ... is this an old technology that is begin replaced by
a more mature XML environment?
Yes, it's quite old - it dates from the CF 4 timeframe. I
Maybe I am posting on the wrong forum.
Is that a better one to use?
Thanks
Archie
Archie Campbell wrote:
I am finding this task uncharacteristically difficult to do with Cold
Fusion.
I suspect there is an easier way, I just cant think of it.
Here is the situation.
There is an external
No, this forum should be find...
Hmm, first of all, it appears you are accepting an XML document, which
you are painstakingly converting to a struct (not sure how), and then
you want to turn it right back into XML again?
Are you receiving in a string variable which you run through xmlparse to
You say that the web service returns XML, why don't you work the XML with CF's
XML functions?
Do a CFDump on what they send and see what it is. If it is XML you will
probably need to run XMLParse() on it to turn it into a CF XML object. Then
run CFDump on it.
The CF documentation has some
Maybe I am posting on the wrong forum.
Is that a better one to use?
No, it's just that long, complex questions may not be as easily answered as
short questions. Fortunately for me, your question isn't actually that
complicated, if I understand you correctly.
After I had the struct I thought I
Dave Watts wrote:
Maybe I am posting on the wrong forum.
Is that a better one to use?
No, it's just that long, complex questions may not be as easily answered as
short questions. Fortunately for me, your question isn't actually that
complicated, if I understand you correctly.
Does that mean that the guy at the other end must be CF so
that it can use the CFWDDX tag to deserialize it, or ...
No, WDDX is just an XML language, so it can be deserialized by other
programs. There are (or were at least) WDDX libraries for several languages,
available at openwddx.org, if I
10 matches
Mail list logo