On Friday 09 Nov 2007, Joeri B wrote:
> I got it now, I can make OO objects/CFC's which can be easily re-used in
> another application, or other CFC's. So I write less CFC's...
And less fragile glue to hold them together too.
I wrote a brief comparison of where LightWire and ColdSpring differ here
Thanks for all the help. Meanwhile I played with LightWire to get a feel of
true IoC. I used 2 cfc, and wired them together. Product CFC and a tax
calculator CFC. Product CFC depended on tax calculator to exist.
I got it now, I can make OO objects/CFC's which can be easily re-used in
another a
each of the learner.
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 3:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFC in application scopeor else?
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 7:14 PM, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Nov 8, 2007 7:14 PM, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is, I didn't see any answer or guidance in the question.
> When someone has no clue about the broader implications of their
> question, they can't understand the significance of the response
> question. It's just obfus
ve Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFC in application scopeor else?
>
> > I'm sure he's just looking for observations/pros/cons about
> > the direction he's taking. Like me, before swimming
> I'm sure he's just looking for observations/pros/cons about
> the direction he's taking. Like me, before swimming in
> unknown waters, I check with the locals about possible sharks
> in the waters.
>
> But everyone keeps answering his question with more questions.
Why do you think that is?
--Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:52 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFC in application scopeor else?
>
> > Which one (CFC in application scope OR framework) is the best
> > practice for a small appli
All Singletons are set up in the Application scope regardless of whether you
do it yourself or use a dependency injection framework. The benefits of the
DI frameworks have more to do with managing dependencies in your model.
All that said, I'd recommend looking at ColdSpring for about any size
pro
> Which one (CFC in application scope OR framework) is the best
> practice for a small application?
Why do you think that there is a single, universal best practice that
answers this question?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest cal
No issue, since by default ColdSpring caches objects in the
application scope anyway.
As for the original question, yes, there's less value in a dependency
injection framework if you don't have dependencies to inject.
On Nov 8, 2007 10:12 PM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong with pu
What's wrong with putting objects in application scope? As long as it's
done right, then what's the issue?
On Nov 8, 2007 7:04 AM, Joeri B < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a small application with some CFC's (no dependencies yet). At my
> work we cach/put our CFC's in the applicati
11 matches
Mail list logo
