Thanks very much for clearing this up Matt and Dave, I was using
type=request.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
snip
If I recall correctly, this is the execution order for error handlers
I am a bit confused as to the difference? When I use CFERror, I am using it
as a site-wide handler?
Then, I can use CFTRY/CFCATCH on individual pages.
Are you talking about 404 handlers??
...
Ben Nadel
Web Developer
Nylon Technology
350 7th Avenue
Floor 10
New York, NY
]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
I am a bit confused as to the difference? When I use CFERror, I am using
it as a site-wide handler?
Then, I can use CFTRY/CFCATCH on individual pages.
Are you talking about 404 handlers
.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Brownlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
No, the site wide error handler is specified in the CF Admin under the
Server Settings Settings section. That will catch any
, 2006 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
No, the site wide error handler is specified in the CF Admin under the
Server Settings Settings section. That will catch any error produced by
your site, and the processing will never make it to a page with CFERROR
It's only advantage, IMHO, is ease of deployment. It's certainly not
useful for detailed error reporting like Matt needs.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
Ahhh
Message-
From: Plunkett, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
Yes, I know where it is set. Thanks for confirming the order that they
are processed.
Now we have to find a new way to be secure (by hiding
Thanks, I will look at this details.cfm.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Brownlee
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
Matt, I was responding to Ben there. Didn't intend to oversimplify for you
since you obviously knew about
Robertson
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cferror and the site wide handler
Best way to look at error handling:
1. try/catch blocks are for situations where you have an expected potential
error (i.e. a mime type failure on a file upload) and you want to handle
this known
: 10 May 2006 19:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cferror and the site wide handler
Yes, I know where it is set. Thanks for confirming the order that they are
processed.
Now we have to find a new way to be secure (by hiding all the junk that
default errors reveal), but let the developers see what
Is it possible to use both cferror and the site wide handler
in MX 6.1?
My tests indicate that it is not possible, which is
unfortunate. It seems that the site wide will always take
precedence. Is there a way around that?
My guess is no, but thought I'd check anyway.
I care because
On 5/10/06, Plunkett, Matthew wrote:
My problem is that I have both 2 and 3 implemented. It seems that 2 never
hits unless I turn off 3. Is that expected, or is there a way around it?
That ain't right. Are you sure you are using type=EXCEPTION in the cferror
statement? Dave Watts put up an
12 matches
Mail list logo
