I imagine part of the reason why Macromedia labs are missing
applications that show no gains or even negative gains is the same
reason they missed them with CFMX; Macromedia provides no IP protection
for the applications shared. It is quite likely that a fair number of
complex and important
Exciting stuff! Thanks Tim!
- Calvin
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Buntel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:35 AM
Subject: ColdFusion MX Performance Brief now available
> Hello All -
>
> I'm pleased to inform you that the new Perf
Are those quick stats for the standard implementation of for J2EE?
I've upgraded to 6.1 on Win 2K Advanced Server using standard implementation
and am not seeing any speed improvement over MX??
How about others? any noticeable difference?
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commer
-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:49 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX performance brief now available
> > I was comparing the dual Linux to the quad Windows setup.
>
> I'm not a systems expert, but perhaps someone else can confirm this. As
far
>
> I was comparing the dual Linux to the quad Windows setup.
I'm not a systems expert, but perhaps someone else can confirm this. As far
as I can remember from what I have read, 4 500Mhz processors do not equal 1
2000Mhz. The computing cost to push certain tasks or threads to certain
processors
dnesday, July 24, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX performance brief now available
>
> > Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Linux the highest
> > performing platform available for ColdFusion.
>
> I don't want to sound stup
gt; Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX performance brief now available
>
> The brief says nothing of the sort, and you really can't compare the
> performance of a dual 933Mhz P3 system with a dual 500 Mhz processors,
> Xeon&
-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX performance brief now available
> Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Linux the highest
> performing platform available for ColdFusion.
I don't want to sound stupid, but where did you find that? The Windows boxes were
running a completel
> Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Linux the highest
> performing platform available for ColdFusion.
I don't want to sound stupid, but where did you find that? The Windows
boxes were running a completely different setup than the Linux box:
Win2K: 2 500Mhz PIII Xeon & 512 MB RA
The brief says nothing of the sort, and you really can't compare the
performance of a dual 933Mhz P3 system with a dual 500 Mhz processors,
Xeon's or not.
--
Jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 5:58:05 PM, you wrote:
ML> Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Li
Congratulations to Jessie Noller et all for making Linux the highest
performing platform available for ColdFusion.
Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Cos
11 matches
Mail list logo
