I've had less than stellar luck with eWebEditPro. I've had better luck with
soEditor. Neither runs on a Mac, though eWeb does support Netscape. I just
ran across KTML (http://www.interakt.ro/products/KTML/) this weekend, and it
seems like it might be a good option IE6+ or Mozilla 1.4+, and it'll
> wanted to know other options before committing.
http://www.fredck.com/FCKeditor/
http://www.cfmentor.com/code/index.cfm?action="">
If you use DW this can be worth too:
http://www.massimocorner.com/beta/cf.htm
Massimo Foti
http://www.massimocorner.com
Co-Author
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ntral.com> cc:
Subject: RE: Cont
Well in their defense Safari is "not done". Meaning some features wont
work quite right. I found this out when trying to write a java html
editor (http://www.rohanclan.com/products/openHTMLeditor.cfm if you want
to see - the source part is the best :-D ) and found that you can't
script between appl
Interesting. I didn't know that. Though KTML certainly isn't java, I
wonder what they're using.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:26 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Content Editor for the
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:37, Barney Boisvert wrote:
> Interesting. I didn't know that. Though KTML certainly isn't java, I
> wonder what they're using.
Well whatever it is it doesn't work on linux + mozilla I go there and
get a plain textarea that says KTML safe mode - if that helps ya any.
(So
: Barney Boisvert
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: Content Editor for the web
I've had less than stellar luck with eWebEditPro. I've had better luck with
soEditor. Neither runs on a Mac, though eWeb does support Netscape. I just
ran across
get josh duras flash one. works great. u can pop it up off a page to save
space and post it to the insert cfm page, its quicker than making a reg
one
but its flash so it scares 1/2 u away
> On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:37, Barney Boisvert wrote:
>> Interesting. I didn't know that. Though KTML cert
Michael Hodgdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Content Editor for the web
>
> Hi Barney, what were some of the problems you have had with
> eWebEditPro? Were they mainly client interface issues or
> were you u
7;t know that. Though KTML certainly isn't java, I
> wonder what they're using.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:26 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Content Editor fo
> Most likely Mozilla.
I think Safari is based on Konqueror (KHTML, KJS, etc.)
> IMHO, Java is the way to go, but no one is doing it since the
> JDK doesn't support the latest W3C standards. Of course, my
> recently announced open source project fixes that problem.
"Fixes?" Or "will fix?"
Da
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> get josh duras flash one. works great. u can pop it up off a page to save
> space and post it to the insert cfm page, its quicker than making a reg
> one
> but its flash so it scares 1/2 u away
>
Nah not scared most browsers come with flash n
>IMHO, Java is the way to go,
Java is the way to go on Mac I think for sure, but if you force people
to install something they tend to hate you. Esp. the micro$oft heads who
adamantly hate java.
Flash has what 85%(?) pre-installed or something - Macromedia where are
you? hehehe
> but no one is d
> > IMHO, Java is the way to go, but no one is doing it since the
> > JDK doesn't support the latest W3C standards. Of course, my
> > recently announced open source project fixes that problem.
>
> "Fixes?" Or "will fix?"
>
Fair question considering the way most open source projects start out.
In t
3/02/2004 10:17 Subject: RE: Content Editor for the web
Please respond to
>cc:
> 03/02/2004 10:17 Subject: RE: Content Editor for the web
> Please respond to
they installed separately.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Content Editor for the web
>
> Thats insane - how can that be right?
> 98% have flash b
> Neither are 99% of the web applications out there - look at yahoo or
> googles view source - its a damned mess! I think the lame preview
> function in java is a road block, but I think w3c compliance,
> unfortunately, is not really a factor.
>
You misunderstand my point. Currently, the JDK only s
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 16:14, Matt Liotta wrote:
> > Neither are 99% of the web applications out there - look at yahoo or
> > googles view source - its a damned mess! I think the lame preview
> > function in java is a road block, but I think w3c compliance,
> > unfortunately, is not really a factor.
What is great is that our component is a direct replacement for the
JEditorPane, so if you already have code that relies on it, it is easy
to change. For example if you had the following.
JEditorPane editorPane = new JEditorPane();
editorPane.setEditable(false);
editorPane.setPage("http://www.ya
20 matches
Mail list logo
