Re: Disappointed in Authorize.Net recently; Looking for new merchant server.

2006-11-07 Thread Tony Hicks
John, That's exactly how it used to work. They no longer offer a post-to url. It will reply directly back to the url submitting the information but you cannot add a secondary post-to url. What frustrates me about that is that even though the site is in the same 'version'. They removed that

Re: Disappointed in Authorize.Net recently; Looking for new merchant server.

2006-11-07 Thread Rey Bango
Tony, We switch from Authorize.net to Verisign/PaymentTech and have had great success. Rey... Tony Hicks wrote: John, That's exactly how it used to work. They no longer offer a post-to url. It will reply directly back to the url submitting the information but you cannot add a secondary

Re: Disappointed in Authorize.Net recently; Looking for new merchant server.

2006-11-07 Thread John C. Bland II
Very interesting. I never used it so didn't notice it was gone. Bad move, IMO. On 11/7/06, Tony Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, That's exactly how it used to work. They no longer offer a post-to url. It will reply directly back to the url submitting the information but you cannot add a

RE: Disappointed in Authorize.Net recently; Looking for new merchant server.

2006-11-01 Thread Che Vilnonis
I've been away from Authorize.net for a few years but it does seem they've dropped in popularity and reliability. Really, I have nothing but good things to say about them. 2 years ago, the had a wicked DDOS attack agaist them, but since then, they have been great. The only thing I can think of is

Re: Disappointed in Authorize.Net recently; Looking for new merchant server.

2006-11-01 Thread John C. Bland II
I'm curious why you don't let CF do the redirect/post/call to the second url. From what I can remember, of the abilities, you can easily set a url to post to once the payment was made. I don't know how it works (silent or not) but I know you can do it. I just let Auth.net process and that's it. I