Real fun. I'm surprised that they get away with that, especially with the
recent Target agreement with the National Federation of the Blind over
accessibility. The NFB sued Target over the lack of accessibility and Target
caved.
larry
>> Josh Nathanson wrote:
>> > Along the lines of the clien
> Josh Nathanson wrote:
> > Along the lines of the client/server side validation discussion last
> week...
> >
> > Go to gap.com and disable your JS, and see what happens.
Screw Gap: do the same thing at Metlife.com
80 million customers, 50 billion in sales and no sense of accessibility.
(As an
Some sites can get away with things like that because of the brand. Others
need to worrie about user approval.
Some stats while were at it because javascript ins't the only thing
developer forget about. Screen Res. is another.
I'm going to start calling these people the 10 %ers. "No Javascript an
I'm not in tune with the client/server side validation discussion that
was going on but I have noticed many sites taking a similar stance as
Gap.com. The JS libs coming out today make it too easy to add very
attractive features to a site and kind of forces a site to choose
between coolness or a
4 matches
Mail list logo