I don't agree that they wouldn't benefit from merging, or
ActionScript gaining some core CFML functionality.
Given that ActionScript (being essentially a variation on JavaScript) relies
on a Flash-specific object model with objects such as movie clips, etc, what
exactly would it mean to merge
.
---
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2001 14:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
I don't agree that they wouldn't benefit from merging, or
ActionScript gaining some core CFML functionality
But, having said that, some sort of CF functionality to write
configs or variables to Flash *before* the movie is served (ie
server-side) would be very nice, which I think is what I was
trying to get at in my own ill-communicated way.
It seems a little backwards to write data to
and independently indicated
by an authorised representative of e-mango.com ltd.
---
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2001 15:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
aha! of course, its as clear as day now.
It was specifically those movies which required dynamic content but did not
require multiple trips to server and back that I was concerned about
-mango.com ltd.
---
-Original Message-
From: Zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2001 16:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Harpoon Release is Final Available
Rich Wild wrote:
/me is especially looking forward to hybrid between
2001 22:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
At 8:59 AM 5/15/1, Steve Drucker wrote:
Once we removed XML as a transport mechanism and started relying
on loadvariables, the average object shrank in byte-size by over
50% and load times, in one particular case
-mango.com ltd.
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 May 2001 22:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
At 8:59 AM 5/15/1, Steve Drucker wrote:
Once we
.
---
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 May 2001 18:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Harpoon Release is Final Available
Out of curiosity, how is data transferred now? Is it still xml
I dont suppose anyone had the beta .zip file anywhere ?
I'd like to have a look at the datagrid that they left out !
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives:
Voice: (508) 240-0051
Fax: (508) 240-0057
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
I dont suppose anyone had the beta .zip file anywhere ?
I'd like to have a look
up my claims.
Thanks,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
Using WDDX at this time, regrettably, is NOT a best practice.
Is this because of some
CEO
Fig Leaf Software
-Original Message-
From: Evan Lavidor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 11:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
Dave,
Can you point me to any documentation/info from Macromedia or Figleaf which
shows this? I'm
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
Well, here's some anecdotal evidence --
Once we removed XML as a transport mechanism and started relying on
loadvariables, the average object shrank in byte-size by over 50% and load
No. It's an inherent limitation.
|-Original Message-
|From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:40 PM
|To: CF-Talk
|Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
|
|
|Is there any way to make the top level of the horizontal tool
|bar scroll?
|I can only
Why?
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
No. It's an inherent limitation.
|-Original Message-
|From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent
Well, you could adjust the font size down to accommodate more options as
well...
-S
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
No. It's an inherent limitation
-level menu is limited by the width and font
attribute values.
|-Original Message-
|From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:31 PM
|To: CF-Talk
|Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
|
|
|Why?
|Rich
|
|-Original Message-
|From: Patricia Lee
is Final Available
Well, you could adjust the font size down to accommodate more options as
well...
-S
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
No. It's an inherent
At 8:59 AM 5/15/1, Steve Drucker wrote:
Once we removed XML as a transport mechanism and started relying
on loadvariables, the average object shrank in byte-size by over
50% and load times, in one particular case (cascading menu), went
from 8 seconds to under 2 seconds.
An URL-encoded data
I seem to remember that in some of the early betas for Harpoon there was
an actionscript file for reading WDDX packets in Flash. Did this disappear?
Or did it simply become subsumed into some of the FLA's. If the latter is
true, could someone point me to the right place to find it? If it's
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 12:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
I seem to remember that in some of the early betas for Harpoon there was
an actionscript file for reading WDDX packets in Flash. Did this disappear?
Or did it simply become subsumed
Steve Drucker wrote:
Using WDDX at this time, regrettably, is NOT a best practice.
Is this because of some problem with Flash?
--
Every cloud has its silver lining, and lightning kills hundreds of
people each year who are trying to find it.
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
At 9:29 AM 5/14/1, Evan Lavidor wrote:
I seem to remember that in some of the early betas for Harpoon
there was an actionscript file for reading WDDX packets in Flash.
Did this disappear?
Although the actual release version of the Macromedia Flash Component Kit
for ColdFusion may not rely on
I've trying to configure Harpoon for the last 2 hours... I just can't figure
out the settings for paths... even tried using absolute mappings. Still
getting 404s after a page half-loads. Help!!!
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Steve Drucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's gone...the Harpoon
Out of curiosity, how is data transferred now? Is it still xml?
jon
- Original Message -
From: Steve Drucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:06 PM
Subject: RE: Harpoon Release is Final Available
It's gone...the Harpoon documentation
Using WDDX at this time, regrettably, is NOT a best practice.
Is this because of some problem with Flash?
Yes. The current version of Flash doesn't handle XML as efficiently as raw
string data.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202)
27 matches
Mail list logo
