http://www.succor.co.uk/index.cfm/2007/8/15/CF8-Getting-image-metadata <-
from my blog - HTH
On 14/08/07, Jayesh Viradiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> ImageInfo() function is doesn't provide the metadata information. It's
> about the Image File properties.
>
> If you need to extract the M
Thanks Jayesh...
That is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks again.
>Hi
>
>ImageInfo() function is doesn't provide the metadata information. It's
>about the Image File properties.
>
>If you need to extract the Metadata, you can use the following
>functions.
>
>ImageGetIPTCMetadata()
>ImageGet
Hi
ImageInfo() function is doesn't provide the metadata information. It's
about the Image File properties.
If you need to extract the Metadata, you can use the following
functions.
ImageGetIPTCMetadata()
ImageGetIPTCTag()
ImageGetExifMetadata()
ImageGetEXIFTag()
Thanks
Jayesh Viradiya
Adobe C
since it has basically nothing to do with cf at all, you could do it the "raw"
way and look up the EXIF specification, which is -afaik- used to store this
information, and read the needed info via cffile (as binary).
i just opened a .jpg file and found the exif header plus the information youre
On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote:
> > > there is no enforceable contract, so cfinterface turns into an
> > > elaborate commenting mechanism with a runtime performance penalty.
> >
> > Did you try the CF8 beta yet :-) ?
>
> That's the Mona Lisa smiley - I can tell you're thinking someth
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 7:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is
> ColdFusion OO?)
>
>
> On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Met
>
> For example, if converting code from typed to untyped for performance
> reasons,
Anyone know of an article that explains this (I'm blissfully unaware of this
issue)...
I like your thinking. I once wrote a CFC Documentor, for inhouse use, that
documents the component in either HTML or Word XM
On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote:
> there is no enforceable contract, so cfinterface turns into an elaborate
> commenting mechanism with a runtime performance penalty.
Did you try the CF8 beta yet :-) ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to synergistically accelerate sexy e-business
on: http:
o: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MetaData Tags
No wonder you're confused. That's a really horrible blog entry. Try these:
http://www.google.com/search?q=folksonomies
We're giving them some thought here instead of or in paral
onsin-Extension
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:25 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: MetaData Tags
>
> Ooops, sorry, I'm talking about this
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2005/04
Ah. . so you want to see some stuff about meta data.
You're looking for meta data data
If I knew where you could find your meta data data, i'd be able to
give you some meta data data data.
But I'm not a singer, and this is sounding like a rap song now.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Austra
Thank You, I'll look into it.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MetaData Tags
Bryan,
You're talking about the semantic web which is Tim Berners Lee's plan for
web 2.0.
http://e
gt;
> Ooops, sorry, I'm talking about this
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2005/04/20.html#a1219
>
> Not meta tags, meta data tags. :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject
be too thrilled to know you got us daves mixed up ;)
>
>
> From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:29 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: MetaData Tags
>
> ahem. I am now going to send a copy of this c
I'm sure Dave won't be too thrilled to know you got us daves mixed up ;)
From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MetaData Tags
ahem. I am now going to send a copy of this conversat
I probably didn't get an answer because everyone was thinking the same thing
you did and they thought I was being strange so they ignored me. :-)
Thanks Anyways
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subjec
e-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: MetaData Tags
>
> In ten words or less meta tags are a lot less important than they were
> because of Google. Still, they affect page rank on other search
> engines
Ooops, sorry, I'm talking about this
http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2005/04/20.html#a1219
Not meta tags, meta data tags. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MetaData Tags
In ten words or
In ten words or less meta tags are a lot less important than they were
because of Google. Still, they affect page rank on other search
engines, such as Yahoo, I am told (some contradictory information
here). The really brief tutorial is that the most important meta tags
are description and keyword
> Sorry for asking a little bit off topic here. I heard a lot
> about meta-data lately. I thought meta-data is meta tags for
> a web page, but they talk about creating a standard meta-data
> so every developer can use it. So obviously it is not meta
> tags. They said they use metadata to i
Awesome. Thanks Sean, and Ray for the extra info... Very helpful. From your
example, this looks to me essentially like creating a CFC which functions
similarly to some cfassociated custom tags with the added bonus of being
able to take advantage of class inheritance, so this looks very cool.
It's
What kind of metadata you are looking for? I can give you some sample
code/pointers on how to do a CFX (C++). I did mine out of a sample from
MSDN (called cat.cpp or something like that). Uses MFC and other crap, but
if you compile it in a single DLL you should be OK. They do many things
metad
u could use the win32::odbc perl extension and get the table names that way,
I think the method is tablelist() or something similair
Stew
-Original Message-
From: Reynolds, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 September 2000 11:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Metadata 2
ODBC coneects
> well, I thought that exists a generic form to do that through ODBC for all
> databases.
>
> Juandres
Maybe using ADO ??? But I've never used it against oracle ...
~Justin MacCarthy
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archiv
well, I thought that exists a generic form to do that through ODBC for all
databases.
Juandres
- Original Message -
From: DeVoil, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: Medadata
> Which DB?
>
> -Original Mess
ODBC coneects you to a database. The type of the database determines what
tables you have to look at to get the metadata.
> --
> From: Juan Andres Alvarez Valenzuela[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 29 September 2000 11:24
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Metadata 2
>
> s
26 matches
Mail list logo
