RE: No more ColdFusion "Professional"?

2003-08-14 Thread Ben Forta
Actually, those early numbers were off. A JRun+CF instance combo is about 50 MB. --- Ben -Original Message- From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: No more ColdFusion "Professional"? Just be aware

RE: No more ColdFusion "Professional"?

2003-08-14 Thread Kola Oyedeji
Also it appears that CFMX for J2EE has been streamlined as well? Kola >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 05 August 2003 12:20 >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: No more ColdFusion "Professional"? >> >> See: >> >> http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia

Re: No more ColdFusion "Professional"?

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Peter Tilbrook wrote: > See: > > http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2003/cfmx_ship.html > > The ColdFusion MX editions have been streamlined as part of this update, so > users can more easily select the option that fits their needs. ColdFusion MX > 6.1 is available in both an Enterpris

Re: No more ColdFusion "Professional"?

2003-08-05 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Peter Tilbrook wrote: > Just be aware that each "instance" of CFMX will use at least 100Mb of RAM as > (source the, er, July edition of CFDJ). I have instances running on as little as 43 MB (JMC instance and my own server monitoring instance). The rest starts at that number, but increases as the

RE: No more ColdFusion "Professional"?

2003-08-05 Thread Peter Tilbrook
Just be aware that each "instance" of CFMX will use at least 100Mb of RAM as (source the, er, July edition of CFDJ). >> For hosting this is a very nice change, instead of just Sandboxes in Enterprise Edition, I can now both run multiple instances and use Sandboxes inside those instances. Jochem