Charlie Griefer
>I'm going to reply in (and hopefully move the thread to) cf-community
:)
Same here, and just did. I can speak more freely there than we need to
see here, anyway. I won't post here on this again.
Sorry to all for the OT...
Matt Robe
I'm going to reply in (and hopefully move the thread to) cf-community :)
- Original Message -
From: "John Munyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: OT Plagiarism accusation stops
thers outweighs that pain.
Just my 2cents.
John
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 6/17/2004 3:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT Plagiarism accusation stops posting
I think my real mistake was, despite the best intentions, it was m
Guy Rish wrote:
>I'd bet that it is most specifically that the verbiage is a match.
Everything was an identical match. Three entire articles and their code
were duplicated precisely to the character (except for the one we
removed, which was missing a line that broke the code). You've already
see
I think my real mistake was, despite the best intentions, it was my
material. Big mistake which I have learnt from. My inentions were good but I
stuffed up basically!
_
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 3:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT Plagiarism ac
From: Guy Rish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 4:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT Plagiarism accusation stops posting
Michael,
While I haven't read the article/tutorials in question, I'm guessing that it
isn't a matter of plagiarizi
Michael,
While I haven't read the article/tutorials in question, I'm guessing that it
isn't a matter of plagiarizing the technical content. I'd bet that it is
most specifically that the verbiage is a match.
It would be difficult to write a tutorial for a general technique that did
not germinate f
7 matches
Mail list logo
