Jeremy,
Thanks for pointing that out. I never changed the heap size through JMC,
always edited jvm.config. Advocating moving from JRun to another server due
to this bug seems a really radical step when you can just make changes to
jvm.config instead of using the JMC.
Besides, if you use the JMC
x27;s exact same on Pro though...you will have to try...
-Stace
_
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 26, 2003 3:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
> We own a full professional version of CMFX and a full version
> of J
Huh? What class-path issues with CFMX on JRun? I've run in this
configuration on several computers (as well as with WebLogic) and haven't
had any "classpath" issues.
Sam
--
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/chartin
> We own a full professional version of CMFX and a full version
> of JRUN 4. When running them together CFMX grabs every .jsp
> file and won't let JRUN 4 process them. I shouldn't have to
> purchase an enterprise version of CFMX to use JRUN 4 and CFMX
> together.
Well, you probably don't have
Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
> There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice
> with the one in CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave
> up in t
An install option if u own enterprise license.
Stace
_
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 26, 2003 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
> If you're running CFMX 6.1, I'd recommend taking a look at just
running
JRUN4 and CFMX together.
> If you're running CFMX 6.1, I'd recommend taking a look at just running
CFMX
> on top of your existing JRun install
Is "CFMX for J2EE" now simply an install option for Enterprise then? Or is
it a different product version?
Nick
[Today
> If you're running CFMX 6.1, I'd recommend taking a look at just running
CFMX
> on top of your existing JRun install
Is "CFMX for J2EE" now simply an install option for Enterprise then? Or is
it a different product version?
Nick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsub
You should be using the J2EE version if you have JRun installed on it's own.
JRun provides separate server instances within one installation which is all
you need for segregation of applications.
Sam
--
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www
> There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice
> with the one in CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave
> up in the end and we're running our pure Java apps through
> CFMX Enterprise's built-in JRun as well as our CF apps. Sounds
> crazy but it works OK.
If you're running
> We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work
> together. Are there any special tweaks or requirements needed
> to get the two working together?
>
> Do I need to use CFMX Enterprise version with JRUN 4 or will
> the standard version work just as well?
I'm not sure what you mean
> We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work together.
There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice with the one in
CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave up in the end and we're running
our pure Java apps through CFMX Enterprise's built-in JRun as well as ou
12 matches
Mail list logo
