RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Adam Wayne Lehman
AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA I think you will find that most of the people who complained about the NDA breach have actaully been on it since Alpha 1! -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2003 16:42 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Adam Wayne Lehman
-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA I think you will find that most of the people who complained about the NDA breach have actaully been on it since Alpha 1! -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2003 16:42 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Adam Wayne Lehman
Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA I think you will find that most of the people who complained about the NDA breach have actaully been on it since Alpha 1! -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2003 16:42 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA Lighten

Re: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Dana Tierney
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > == > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > - Original Message - From: "Adam Wayne Lehman" > <[EMAIL PRO

Re: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Doug White
nt: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:42 AM Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA | Lighten up, it's Friday. | | Peter I apologize for all the anal jealous bastards (no one in | particular) on this list, cuz MM announced the beta _publicly_ June 2. | | Adam Wayne Lehman | Web Systems Developer | Johns Hopki

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread David Collie (itndac)
I'm with you adam, it all seemed a little over the top even now, several days later. I think just a prod from an official MM guy would have been sufficient Its up to *them* to enforce *their* law methinks > > Lighten up, it's Friday. > > Peter I apologize for all the anal jealous bast

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
I think you will find that most of the people who complained about the NDA breach have actaully been on it since Alpha 1! -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2003 16:42 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA Lighten up, it's Friday.

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Adam Wayne Lehman
ginal Message- From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA It's MM's decision to release info about the beta, not the testers. M -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Haggerty, Mike
It's MM's decision to release info about the beta, not the testers. M -Original Message- From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:44 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RED SKY BETA Maybe some owe Peter an apology. It wasn't more than 4

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-13 Thread Adam Wayne Lehman
Maybe some owe Peter an apology. It wasn't more than 4 days ago he got flamed for merely mentioning 'Red Sky Beta'. Adam Wayne Lehman Web Systems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Damon Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-12 Thread Barney Boisvert
ertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:59 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: RED SKY BETA > > > Damon, > > That signup url gives me a 404. > > I signed up yesterday. Hoping to hear back :D > > --- >

Re: RED SKY BETA

2003-06-12 Thread Matt Robertson
Damon, That signup url gives me a 404. I signed up yesterday. Hoping to hear back :D --- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com --- -- Original Message --

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
Strewth, all I stated was the beta 2 was available. ** The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Lee Fuller
McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:14 AM | Subject: RE: Red Sky beta 2 released | | | > Also, Just because MM talks about it, that doesn't mean you | are still | > not under NDA. | > | > T

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Cantrell, Adam
I doubt any of them do this - better to go for the personal recognition ;P Adam. > -Original Message- > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:28 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released > > > OK...why d

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Doug White
, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: "Christian Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:23 PM Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released | We haven't sent out responses to everyone yet, b

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Bryan Stevenson
ancouverisland.com > > - Original Message - > > From: "David K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:59 AM > > Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released > > > > > &g

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Christian Cantrell
dia Associate Partner > www.macromedia.com > - > Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group > Founder & Director > www.cfug-vancouverisland.com > - Original Message - > From: "David K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Bryan Stevenson
--- > > From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:58 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Red Sky beta 2 released > > > > > nicely put thanks for not calling people idiots. > > > > Anyone who agrees

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Nick McClure
alk > Subject: RE: Red Sky beta 2 released > > > nicely put thanks for not calling people idiots. > > Anyone who agrees to a NDA, then violates it without a second thought is > just wishing for problems > > They put the NDA there for a reason - because the informat

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Tangorre
uot;Philip Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:58 PM Subject: RE: Red Sky beta 2 released > > nicely put thanks for not calling people idiots. > > Anyone who agrees to a NDA, then violates it withou

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Dave Lyons
hum.. who's more of an idiot? The idiot or the one who calls the idiot an idiot? - Original Message - From: "Philip Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:54 AM Subject: RE: Red Sky bet

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Philip Arnold
> nicely put thanks for not calling people idiots. Anyone who agrees to a NDA, then violates it without a second thought is just wishing for problems They put the NDA there for a reason - because the information is for NON DISCLOSURE! Admittedly using the word "idiot" is a little strong, but

Re: Red Sky Beta 2

2003-06-10 Thread Doug White
p/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 == If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: "Che Vilnonis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:50 AM Subject: RE: Red Sky Be

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Mike Kear
It's ok to say WHAT Red Sky is, because Macromedia have it on the web site. There's an overview at http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/presentation/redsky/ Red Sky is the next update to CFMX. And what we know from events happening here in the last few days, and the statements of some

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Bryan Stevenson
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:59 AM Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released > MM recently announced that they were opening up > the RedSky beta program to new testers. I have > applied but heard nothing. I'm assuming that this > will be another case where MM will o

Re: Red Sky Beta 2

2003-06-10 Thread Taz
> Its a shepherds delight if it happens at night Yeah, Shepherd's don't get much. The sheep keep running away when they hear the sound of a zip. Taz ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subsc

Re: Red Sky Beta 2

2003-06-10 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Che Vilnonis wrote: > Is it against the NDA to tell me what Red Sky is??? > I've been away for a while...and I am clueless. http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/presentation/redsky/ This is the official information. Everything else should be regarded as gossip and would best be forgotte

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Tangorre
nicely put thanks for not calling people idiots. - Original Message - From: "Christian Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56 AM Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released > On Tuesday, Jun

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread David K
MM recently announced that they were opening up the RedSky beta program to new testers. I have applied but heard nothing. I'm assuming that this will be another case where MM will only contact successful applicants. Has anyone else here who applied for round 2 heard anything? --David K - Or

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Lee Fuller wrote: > I think it's amazing that people with NDA's simply announce beta info > on > open lists. Kinda against the purpose of an "NON DISCLOSURE" > agreement -- > isn't it? It is best to always err on the side of caution and only post inform

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Philip Arnold
> Yeah, and the rest of us who *want* to get on the Betas > (again) have difficulty. > > How's that screening process work again? ;-) Simple, idiots who break it by announcing things on lists like this are black-listed It's called NON-DISCLOSURE for a reason ~

RE: Red Sky Beta 2

2003-06-10 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Its a shepherds delight if it happens at night -Original Message- From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 June 2003 16:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Red Sky Beta 2 Is it against the NDA to tell me what Red Sky is??? I've been away for a while...and I am clueless.

RE: Red Sky Beta 2

2003-06-10 Thread Che Vilnonis
Is it against the NDA to tell me what Red Sky is??? I've been away for a while...and I am clueless. ~CV -Original Message- From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released Well, we prefer that p

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Russ
Yeah, and the rest of us who *want* to get on the Betas (again) have difficulty. How's that screening process work again? ;-) > -Original Message- > From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:46 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Red

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Lee Fuller
esday, June 10, 2003 8:38 AM | To: CF-Talk | Subject: Re: Red Sky beta 2 released | | | Well, we prefer that people respect their NDAs. | | mike chambers | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | - Original Message - | From: "Thane Sherrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "CF-Talk

Re: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Mike Chambers
Well, we prefer that people respect their NDAs. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Thane Sherrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: RE: Red Sky beta 2 release

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Philip Arnold
> I'm sure Macromedia cares if people outside an open beta find > out if beta 2 is released. You mean people signed NDA's for nothing? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http:

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 01:08 PM 06/10/03 +0100, Philip Arnold wrote: > > For those beta testing Red Sky, MM have just released beta 2, > > available at the usual place. > > > > Happy testing. > >The funny thing is that the people on the Beta test will be informed... > >From official sources! > >If you're on the Beta,

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Philip Arnold
> For those beta testing Red Sky, MM have just released beta 2, > available at the usual place. > > Happy testing. The funny thing is that the people on the Beta test will be informed... >From official sources! If you're on the Beta, you signed the NDA... Try sticking to it ~~

RE: Red Sky beta 2 released

2003-06-10 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
you supposed to be posting here? -Original Message- From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 23:47 To: CF-Talk Subject: Red Sky beta 2 released For those beta testing Red Sky, MM have just released beta 2, available at the usual place. Happy testing. == Peter