RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-11-01 Thread Dave Watts
> OK, so it looks like for what I need (a SQL server on my > local development machine -- my 120 eval is about to expire, > and I've really started to dig SQL Server), I need the > developers edition. This costs $500. > > With this, I could, if I wanted -- in addition to my usual > CF-based

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-11-01 Thread Patrick Harkins
ent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:56 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. > > >Ahhh... Ooops... I stand corrected. There's a first for everything =) > >Here's Microsoft's link to a comparison: > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/library

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Jeffry Houser
: grumble, grumble: I wish I knew that a year ago. Thanks At 04:27 PM 10/30/2001 -0500, you wrote: > > SQL Server 2000 will not install on Windows 9x. You must > > have either NT or 2000. You can install the client tools, > > such as Enterprise Manager and Query Analyzer. But, the > > Server p

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Owens, Howard
OK, so it looks like for what I need (a SQL server on my local development machine -- my 120 eval is about to expire, and I've really started to dig SQL Server), I need the developers edition. This costs $500. With this, I could, if I wanted -- in addition to my usual CF-based development -- cre

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Dave Watts
> SQL Server 2000 will not install on Windows 9x. You must > have either NT or 2000. You can install the client tools, > such as Enterprise Manager and Query Analyzer. But, the > Server portion will not work. SQL Server 97 worked great. > 2000 was a no go. Au contraire: http://www.microsoft.co

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Craig
fry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. I have one more thing to add to all of this. ( It is in-line) At 12:55 PM 10/30/2001 -0800, you wrote: >Ahhh... Ooops... I stand corrected. There's a fi

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
er 30, 2001 12:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. Ahhh... Ooops... I stand corrected. There's a first for everything =) Here's Microsoft's link to a comparison: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ ar_sa2_9gz

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Jeffry Houser
default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ >ar_sa2_9gz4.asp > >-Original Message- >From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:01 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. > > > > It's called msde.

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. > It's called msde. It comes with Office 2000/XP. Not Really a > desktop edition but rather a scaled down implementation of SQL Server. > > As far as I know, if you have an Offi

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Dave Watts
> Ok...let's say I believe you...where is the developers > edition? If you try installing 2000 on a Windows 2000 > machine the first thing it tells you is that you cannot > install it on workstation. Uh, you have to BUY it. It's a separate product, to the best of my knowledge. If you're an MSD

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Craig
ially the way it works with SQL. -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. > oh...i've seen the msde stuff...not real impressed but a > good desktop mechanis

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Dave Watts
> oh...i've seen the msde stuff...not real impressed but a > good desktop mechanism...I was hoping for a full blown > version of the database server for a workstation like they > used to have with 6.5 and 7.0. Well, they do have that. If you just want to install SQL Server on your workstation

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Craig
esday, October 30, 2001 1:50 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. It's called msde. It comes with Office 2000/XP. Not Really a desktop edition but rather a scaled down implementation of SQL Server. As far as I know, if you have an Office 2000/XP licence, you have a MSDE

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Dave Watts
> It's called msde. It comes with Office 2000/XP. Not Really a > desktop edition but rather a scaled down implementation of SQL Server. > > As far as I know, if you have an Office 2000/XP licence, you have > a MSDE licence as well. MSDE isn't the same as SQL Server Desktop Edition. With SQL

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread krisch
Yes, it's actually called "Personal Edition". I'm not sure of the licencing issues. I would guess that there is at least one licence included since it comes with the server edition. FWIW, Kristine C. Hege [EMAIL PROTECTED] Database & Applications SpecialistPhone: (802)

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
ECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. There is a desktop version? -Original Message- From: Bosky, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: SQL Server 2000 desktop ve

RE: SQL Server 2000 desktop version.

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Craig
There is a desktop version? -Original Message- From: Bosky, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: SQL Server 2000 desktop version. Do you need a license to install the desktop version of SQL Server 2000? Thanks. Dave ~~~