Setting varchar this large can adversely affect performance. Use text
instead.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL question
Varchar can go to 8096.
-Original Message-
From: Peter
Varchar can go to 8096.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 12:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL question
The limit of a 'text' data field is something like 2 Gigabytes, although
many drivers will cut it off at
s without errors.
>
>~Simon
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Corina S. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:52 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: SQL question
>
>
>I'm positive it was truncated. I pulled the data directly out of SQL
fields without errors.
~Simon
-Original Message-
From: Corina S. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL question
I'm positive it was truncated. I pulled the data directly out of SQL and
over half of it is missing.
- Original
You can change it to nvarchar and set the length at what you want
-Original Message-
From: Corina S. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL question
Hi List,
I am Learning SQL by trial and error. So far so good -- Unt
I'm positive it was truncated. I pulled the data directly out of SQL and
over half of it is missing.
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Horwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:47 PM
Subject:
are you sure the value was truncated in the database, or might it be that
it's being truncated by Query Analyzer or Studio Query Builder, or whatever
youre using to view the data? Just checking... I've had that happen to me,
but have never had actual data loss before.
~Simon
-Original Messa
This will do it:
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM RealtorInfo
WHERE RealtorID IN (SELECT RealtorID FROM Homes WHERE HomeID IN(#homelist#))
Chris
--
Original Message
From: ""<[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul smith)>
Subject: Re: SQL Question
D
Easy solution :-)
SELECT ID
FROM Homes
WHERE HomeID IN(#homelist#)
Then convert the query to a list. I forget the function for this.
Then run you 2nd query like so:
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM RealtorInfo
WHERE RealtorID in
This should do the trick, or if I am
Sounds like you need a subselect. Try this:
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM RealtorInfo
WHERE RealtorID IN
( SELECT DISTINCT RealtorID
FROM Homes
HERE HomeID IN(#homelist#) )
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1
If your realtorID is one of the fields that is in your HOMES table and your
homes query was named getHomesInfo, then you would say:
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM RealtorInfo
WHERE RealtorID = #getHomesInfo.RealtorID#
Larry Juncker
Senior Cold Fusion Programmer
Heartland Communications Group, I
best, paul
At 12:47 PM 10/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a list of ID's and I want to query based on those ID's so I have
>SELECT *
>FROM Homes
>WHERE HomeID IN(#homelist#)
>
>Now here is the question I want to run a query that pull info from another
>table based on the results of that quer
Well, if you want one query, use something like:
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM RealtorInfo
WHERE RealtorID in
(SELECT RealtorID
FROM Homes
WHERE HomeID IN (#homelist#))
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Oc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A summary to help others. My question was, given a table like this:
> userid, course
> john ethics
> john english
> mary english
> mary math
> mary bio
How to get the user that has taken the most courses and another query to
see
Yes, first of all, put the courses in a different table.
Then setup a linking table between the people table and the courses table.
Then you can run counts on the linking table and join in data from the other tables as
required.
---mark
Try this:
select top 1 userID, count(course) from
group by userid
order by 2 desc
select top 1 course, count(userid) from
group by course
order by 2 desc
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 8:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT
You can't do it without one other row that has a UNIQUE identifier.
--K
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 11:59 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: ot: sql question
>
>
> here's what i'm doing
>
> delete from class_regist
I have to wonder why the same Users_ID would be registered for the same
class
4 times(a very large person needing 4 seats??) That aside. Add an Identity
field
for the table. class_registration_ID. Then delete from class_registration
where class_registration_ID = theIDnumber
- Original Messag
> > I would like to add "omit <> 'yes' " to the WHERE clause. When I
> > do this, the
> > query returns 0 records (unmodified, it returns 25 records).
> AND NOT omit = 'yes'
In addition to Kevin's comments, some flavors of SQL (especially SQL Server)
treat NULL differently - so "NOT omit='Yes'" w
John,
You should be able to say:
AND NOT omit = 'yes'
That's assuming that omit is a text field and not a boolean (yes/no)
field. If its boolean you could just say:
AND omit = false
hth,
Kevin
At 01:33 PM 8/11/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi all
>
>Here the query I'm trying to edit:
>
>
> SELEC
> How do I set the default current date in SQL 7
The function getdate() will return the current date/time in SQL 7. If you
want a field that is set to the current date/time when a record is inserted,
add a datetime field to the database and set the default value to getdate().
- Sean
~~
Hi,
Not sure if following will help:
using a select distinct and order by EffectiveDate DESC clause with your
table
Regards
wai leng
- Original Message -
From: Angél Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 2:18 AM
Subject: SQL Question: Select
select e1.*
fromemployee_info e1
where e1.deptno = #deptno"
and e1.eff_date =
(select max(e2.eff_date)
fromemployee_info e2
where e2.empno = e1.empno)
i think...
-Original Mes
Two ideas . . . you might want to compare to check for speed differences, or
hold out for a better answer . . .
One:
select emp_id, emp_name, dept_id, max(effective_date) effective_date
from employees
group by emp_id, emp_name, dept_id
Depending on the size of the table and the way it is design
Try:
select sum(time) as sumtime
from timesheets where employee_id = #Client.employee_id# and
submitted = 1 and
date = #getfor#
Segalla
- Original Message -
From: James Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Cf-Talk Mailing List (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 5:20 P
If you're using MS SQL Server (I'm not sure how many other dbs support this)
you can use the TOP keyword to specify how many records to return. In your
case, it would be:
Select TOP 3 SUM(Quantity) AS TopBooks, BookID
>From OrderItems
GROUP BY BookID
ORDER BY TopBooks DESC
The TOP keyword also
On 4/29/00, Brian Ingram penned:
>Query:
>
>Select SUM(Quantity) AS TopBooks, BookID
>From OrderItems
>GROUPBY BookID
>ORDER BY TopBooks DESC
>
>
>Here is what i get when i run this query(show below). All I want is
>the top 3 books returned. How can i do this with SQL?
>
>TopBooks BookID
Ii'm not 100% sure of what it is you are trying to do. Are you looking to
pull all the information in 'tblData' that corresponds to the uid in
tblSomeInfo If so, you do this.
SELECT d.*
FROM tblSomeInfo s, tblData d
WHERE s.uid = [whichever uid you are looking for] AND s.uid = d.uid
That
501 - 528 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
