On Friday 14 Dec 2007, Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
> Do you have any of CF8's Server Monitoring enabled? It's known to cause
> performance issues and should only be used to debug problems;
You can (I'd argue should) have the first level of monitoring enabled.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to elementar
>>Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating problem.
>After
>>starting CF, it will run for a while (sometimes serveral hours, sometimes
>>less than an hour) at about 1% - 3% in terms of processor load. (It's a 2
>>cpu - 4 core system.) Then, all of a sudden, the processor load w
--Original Message-
From: Bob Hendren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2007 11:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Server performance problem since upgrading to CF8
>Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating problem.
>After starting CF, it will run for a while (som
>Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating problem. After
>starting CF, it will run for a while (sometimes serveral hours, sometimes
>less than an hour) at about 1% - 3% in terms of processor load. (It's a 2
>cpu - 4 core system.) Then, all of a sudden, the processor load will
Kevin Pompei wrote:
> Well I've isolated the problem down. It happens 1 hour and 7 minutes after
> restart which it time that is set for the client stores to be purged. This
> must be a bug in CF because once it starts the one CPU core is at 100% and
> stays there even for days until the server i
m
> the JVM.config file - and the general config of the server?
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Pompei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:53 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Server performance problem since upgrading to CF
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Pompei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Server performance problem since upgrading to CF8
You're correct. One core is at 100%.
On 10/29/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a fo
Thanks Dave. I'll try this.
On 10/29/07, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone seen this, or have any ideas. BTW, I'm running the
> > standard edition of CF so I don't have access to the server monitor.
>
> I suggest you invest in one of the other monitoring tools available -
> SeeF
You're correct. One core is at 100%.
On 10/29/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a four core system, a CPU pegged at 25% means one core is at 100%;
> CF has probably filled the JVM memory and is permanently garbage
> collecting.
>
> I agree with Dave - get FusionReactor and set a
Kevin Pompei wrote:
> Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating problem. After
> starting CF, it will run for a while (sometimes serveral hours, sometimes
> less than an hour) at about 1% - 3% in terms of processor load. (It's a 2
> cpu - 4 core system.) Then, all of a sudden,
You could also install the Dev version locally at and try running the code
with the server monitor turned on.
On 10/29/07, Kevin Pompei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating
> problem. After
> starting CF, it will run for a while (sometimes ser
Kevin,
What codebase are you running on it?
Mark
On 10/30/07, Kevin Pompei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every since upgrading to CF8 I've been having a frustrating problem. After
> starting CF, it will run for a while (sometimes serveral hours, sometimes
> less than an hour) at about 1% - 3% in
On a four core system, a CPU pegged at 25% means one core is at 100%;
CF has probably filled the JVM memory and is permanently garbage
collecting.
I agree with Dave - get FusionReactor and set a memory alert threshold
in the crash prevention options.
On 10/30/07, Kevin Pompei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyone seen this, or have any ideas. BTW, I'm running the
> standard edition of CF so I don't have access to the server monitor.
I suggest you invest in one of the other monitoring tools available -
SeeFusion or FusionReactor. You will likely find the problem a lot faster,
and it'll pay for it
14 matches
Mail list logo
