You might want to look at a suggested CFMX OOP design pattern posted
under the ColdFusion topic on http://www.benorama.com. I've been
experimenting with this recently and find it to be very clean and effective.
Cutter
Li Chunshen (Don) wrote:
According to Macromedia's CFMX References on Using
01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement that the file and
the function have the same name? Then you could call any arbitrary
UDF
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file
'I've' built a file system using cfcs and keeping in the cfscript syntax
instead of the tag based, and it's served me well. I understand the thoughts
of having a mapping or dedicated folder for udfs, . but how would that
fair with efficiency? I don't know the logistics of it, but seeing how
: Christian Cantrell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of
UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work?
Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement
that the file
]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of
UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work?
Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement
that the file and
the function have the same name? Then you
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Well, it's hard for us to know that you are interested in a feature if
you don't submit a request for it. I don't consider submitting
feature
requests to be secretary work, so
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Um, no it's not. You just read on the mailing list what feature he is
interested in and he didn't submit
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Well, it's hard for us to know
: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Well, it's hard for us to know that you are interested in a feature if
you don't submit a request for it. I don't consider submitting
feature
requests to be secretary work, so I'll be happy to take
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of
UDFs
Well
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement that the file and
the function have the same name? Then you could call any arbitrary
UDF, and the CF server would look in the proper directory for the right
file, then
.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 2 January 2003 12:01 p.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file
That's exactly what I have in my UDFlib directory and
my thought of how it may work but of course it's up to
MM to make it work as you described.
btw, you need to help me to push MM to fix some
problems as well, such as the Oracle8i driver and
request timeout. Matthew Walker's 2 UDF referrals
That's exactly what I have in my UDFlib directory and
my thought of how it may work but of course it's up to
MM to make it work as you described.
I think it's a good idea. Make sure you submit it at the URL I posted
earlier. All feature requests get reviewed before work on a new
version
: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement that the file
16 matches
Mail list logo
