Re: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 10:07, Susan McNab wrote: > Does anyone know a work-around for this? Am I doing something wrong? Does > 7.0.2 fix this? Having a not for prod use tag is fair enough, but surely it > should be well-formed. Just search and replace it out of the string. -- Tom Chiverton *

Re: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Peter Tilbrook
The Developer Edition modifies the headers sent to the browser - and as a result breaks things like web services and XML. I don't believe there is an easy workaround. Macromedia didn't think the DevEd version through in this regard I think. ~~

RE: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Adrian Lynch
Would there be a way to have the webserver strip this out? Ade -Original Message- From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2006 11:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Web Services - Not for production or development The Developer Edition modifies the headers sent to the

RE: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread James Smith
> The Developer Edition modifies the headers sent to the > browser - and as a result breaks things like web services and > XML. I don't believe there is an easy workaround. Macromedia > didn't think the DevEd version through in this regard I think. I had this problem with an RSS feed, the only

RE: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Snake
In ColdFusion MX 6.1 this watermark could be avoided by setting the content type with CFCONTENT in pages where the watermark broke the generated content, but in CFMX 7 there is no such workaround. Since the DevNet edition is meant for development/QA only, you could remove the existing DevNet seri

Re: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Peter Tilbrook
Note if running under a J2EE server like JRun your licence file will be somewhere like: C:\JRun4\servers\cfusion\cfusion-ear\cfusion-war\WEB-INF\cfusion\lib or whatever other instance you have created. ~| Message: http://www.ho

Re: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Charlie Griefer
http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=80E120C1-50DA-0559-A0CE3D8628309982 there -might- be something in the comments section that -might- be of use. On 7/5/06, Susan McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The insertion of the "Not for Production Use" meta tag is resulting a > va

RE: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-05 Thread Dave Watts
> The insertion of the "Not for Production Use" meta tag is resulting a > validation error which prevents the development and testing of Web > Services on my local CF App Server. I currently have Enterprise Edition > (DevNet) CFMX 7.0.1 (not an ideal verison for Web services, but need to > keep tha

RE: Web Services - Not for production or development

2006-07-06 Thread Andrew Stevens
ating. -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 6 July 2006 12:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Web Services - Not for production or development > The insertion of the "Not for Production Use" meta tag is resulting a > validation error which prevent

Re: Web Services - Not for production or development - Thanks everybody

2006-07-06 Thread News
se DTD" tag into XML output would have to be bug... - Original Message - From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 12:36 AM Subject: RE: Web Services - Not for production or development >> The insertio

Re: Web Services - Not for production or development - Thanks everybody

2006-07-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 06 July 2006 18:50, News wrote: > development. I paid for my software and I am using it legally. I need the > extra IP addresses. We shouldn't have to spend extra time on things like So run CF behind a front end proxy such as Pound, Apache or Squid. -- Tom Chiverton