So will it be possible in CF MX Pro to limit the resources
a hosted customer can access based on the directory in which
his templates are or not?
Not with CF MX Pro's feature set alone, I don't think. You only get one big
sandbox in CF MX Pro.
BTW, giving a price cut is not an option.
Dave Watts wrote:
So will it be possible in CF MX Pro to limit the resources
a hosted customer can access based on the directory in which
his templates are or not?
Not with CF MX Pro's feature set alone, I don't think. You only get one big
sandbox in CF MX Pro.
Yup. Christine already
Dave Watts wrote:
Well, that should save some work. Sandbox Security appears
to be Enterprise Edition only, so we will simply leave the
CF hosting business because there is no way to justify such
an investment :(
Yeah, that's a tough break. However, it seems like the big thing you lose
Technically with Pro, the same set of resource permissions is given to all the
templates, no matter how many CF applications you host.
Christine
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Where's
Dave Watts wrote:
The SiteMinder engine and CF's interface to that engine have been banished
to the hell from whence they came.
To bad I can't find anything about OS level Sandboxes anymore (BTW, OS
level Sandboxes didn't use SiteMinder at all). Means I have to setup
security twice, once
- Making the NET work
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Where's Advanced Security?
Dave Watts wrote:
The SiteMinder engine and CF's interface to that engine have been banished
to the hell
Mike Brunt wrote:
Probably not the best of times to leave, as there will probably be quite an
increase in demand for CF Hosting and related issues.
Maybe for the market as a whole, but not very likely for our niche.
What would you offer as an alternative?
Currently we also offer ASP, PHP,
To bad I can't find anything about OS level Sandboxes
anymore (BTW, OS level Sandboxes didn't use SiteMinder
at all). Means I have to setup security twice, once
using standard Windows Security for ASP and once for CF,
instead of letting the OS take care of both for me.
That's because
Nope, no more advanced security. There is a new security model in CFMX
though - _very_ simple and very elegant. Check the docs for more info.
===
Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
Email:
I just installed MX and can't seem to find the Advanced
Securiy setting.
Is it gone? seperate install?
The SiteMinder engine and CF's interface to that engine have been banished
to the hell from whence they came.
In place of that, CF MX has a different security architecture, which appears
Siteminder goneoh yeah!! Praise the Lord :-)
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives:
Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: Where's Advanced Security?
I just installed MX and can't seem to find the Advanced
Securiy setting.
Is it gone? seperate install?
The SiteMinder engine and CF's interface to that engine
I'm with you all on this. It was hell but a necessary evil
for our apps. I'm just wondering how bad the migration will
be. I need to find where we define the user directory.
I'll keep looking.
It shouldn't be that traumatic a change. Read Chapter 16 of the Developing
ColdFusion MX
Just went thru that Chapter. I don't see any documentation on using NT
groups as User directories. I hope I'm just missing it.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: Where's Advanced
-
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Where's Advanced Security?
Just went thru that Chapter. I don't see any documentation on using NT
groups as User directories. I hope I'm just missing it.
- Original Message
Hmmm. Not good.
Any suggestions? Any third party stuff out there?
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Where's Advanced Security?
Under the new security model (um, we need a better
29, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Where's Advanced Security?
Under the new security model (um, we need a better name for it - and I'm
not sure what we are calling it, so let's just call it CFMX-Sec), you
are responsible for handling authentication within the cflogin tags.
So, if you want
Any suggestions? Any third party stuff out there?
There are lots of COM interfaces for this. The one I'd suggest (but haven't
yet tested myself with CF MX) is Lewis Sellers' IHTK:
http://www.intrafoundation.com/ihtk.html
I've tested an older version of SA-Admin, and some but not all of it
Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Where's Advanced Security?
Just a crazy question I've always wondered about, but never had the
necessity to research. Can cfldap query information from Active Directory?
AD does support LDAP queries
19 matches
Mail list logo
