At 11:20 AM 1/9/02, Dimo wrote:
>I thought the problem could be somewhere along this line, but wasn't
>sure, since IE and NN 6.2 process the page with a normal speed. I'll try
>to decrease the number of tables... geez, 18 tables... did I really need
>that many of them? :)
Almost never. It's bet
x27;t believe this to be a coincidence.
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: "Dimo Michailov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: Yet another Netscape 4.75 question ...
> Thanks Chr
I have this happen as well but in NS 4.06. I can tell you that NS renders tables much
slower than
IE (when there is a lot of tables anyways), but I suspect there is more to it than
that.
Bryan Stevenson
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
p. 250.920.8830
e.
Thanks Christian:
I thought the problem could be somewhere along this line, but wasn't
sure, since IE and NN 6.2 process the page with a normal speed. I'll try
to decrease the number of tables... geez, 18 tables... did I really need
that many of them? :)
Cheers,
Dimo
Christian Abad wrote:
>
Dimo:
Your problem is the 18 nested tables you use to display the page. Netscape
parses tables from the innermost to the outermost, and will not render the
page until ALL of the tables have been parsed. To get your page to load
faster in Netscape, reduce the number of NESTED tables you are usin
5 matches
Mail list logo
