Answers my question :-) Thanks Tony.
John
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 1:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam oddity
and to answer the question about the nda
even though the cd went out to all in their bag @ max
t the window or how that would work.
John Burns
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 11:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam oddity
Burns, John D wrote:
> Speaking of Blackstone, are NDAs out the window now because of
>regardless of the nda...
>any idea whats up with this query param shite?
I had was having much the same problem intermittently for a while when using a SQL
server db. Usually when I restarted CF, the problem disappeared - for a while.
As a last resort, I started using the Microsoft SQL Server
and to answer the question about the nda
even though the cd went out to all in their bag @ max, they all still
have to sign up for the beta, and accept the nda.
and that my friends is straight from a horses mouth!
:) tw
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:42:16 -0600, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regardless of the nda...
any idea whats up with this query param shite?
tw
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:26:08 +0100, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Burns, John D wrote:
> > Speaking of Blackstone, are NDAs out the window now because of MAX?
>
> I seriously doubt that. Previous NDA's
Burns, John D wrote:
> Speaking of Blackstone, are NDAs out the window now because of MAX?
I seriously doubt that. Previous NDA's from Macromedia never
expired, but allowed you to talk about information that was
public, i.e. also obtainable through other channels. Presuming
Macromedia has not c
eeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 1:00 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfqueryparam oddity
>
>
>
>
> i have the same problem, its new, never happened before, and is now
> happening, same kind of code, almost exact actually.
>
> but same
m: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 1:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam oddity
i have the same problem, its new, never happened before, and is now
happening, same kind of code, almost exact actually.
but same problem.
what gives?
ps. its works in s... (
i have the same problem, its new, never happened before, and is now
happening, same kind of code, almost exact actually.
but same problem.
what gives?
ps. its works in s... (bla**st**) just fine, just not in cfmx 6.1
tw
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:21:40 -0700, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL P
what's the exact datatype of the field in the database?
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:31:59 -0800, Brook Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I added the val function AFTER getting the error - it makes no
> difference...
>
>
>
> At 03:09 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
> >do you need the val() fu
Actually, I added the val function AFTER getting the error - it makes no
difference...
At 03:09 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
>do you need the val() function? is the value coming in as a string or
>numeric?
>
>what happens if you simply #val(arguments.case_id)#?
>
>
>On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:50:24 -08
do you need the val() function? is the value coming in as a string or numeric?
what happens if you simply #val(arguments.case_id)#?
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:50:24 -0800, Brook Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This query was working fine, with the arguments.case_id variable being
> 30026 (and t
12 matches
Mail list logo
