RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ian Skinner
Well that is true of CF professional edition; since with professional a single instance of CF runs all applications on the box. Bad code, such as an endless loop, in any application will crash the entire box and all applications on it. We had this problem with our internal servers here a

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Cutter (CF-Talk)
We did the trial of ReactorFusion, and now we're buying several licenses. There were some processes (related to java libraries used by a few apps) that occasionally would over flood the system(s) with long running thread processes. Upon installing ReactorFusion, our uptime improved

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ray Champagne
I would say that this company would be using an enterprise edition, although I can't be certain. They sure are big enough... I also don't deny the fact that there are dumbasses that will develop horrible, resource-sucking, wasteful apps (hell, I've done it too) on the same box as me, but

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ray Champagne
It sure can't hurt. Google doesn't give me any results for ReactorFusion. URL? Cutter (CF-Talk) wrote: We did the trial of ReactorFusion, and now we're buying several licenses. There were some processes (related to java libraries used by a few apps) that occasionally would over flood the

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Thursday 09 February 2006 16:55, Ray Champagne wrote: Unfortunately ColdFusion is not very stable in shared environment and Virtual servers anyone ? -- Tom Chiverton Advanced ColdFusion Programmer ~| Message:

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ray Champagne
NM...found it after searching for FusionReactor. Thanks, Ray It sure can't hurt. Google doesn't give me any results for ReactorFusion. URL? Cutter (CF-Talk) wrote: We did the trial of ReactorFusion, and now we're buying several licenses. There were some processes (related to java

Re: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
fusionReactor http://www.fusion-reactor.com It is pretty awesome, and am hoping to get it for all our servers in the next budget cycle. On 2/9/06, Ray Champagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sure can't hurt. Google doesn't give me any results for ReactorFusion. URL?

RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread cf
Ian, For us, the solution was to go to CF enterprise so that we could create separate instances for each application. Now causing one instance to lock up with an endless loop does not affect the rest of the applications. This has saved me much embarrassment. correct me if I'm

RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ben Forta
: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:33 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: check out this CS response Ian, For us, the solution was to go to CF enterprise so that we could create separate instances for each application. Now causing one instance to lock up with an endless loop does not affect the rest

RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Dawson, Michael
CF Ent is licensed per server with as many instances as possible on that particular server. M!ke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: check out this CS response Ian, For us

RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ian Skinner
I would say that this company would be using an enterprise edition, although I can't be certain. They sure are big enough... Well, even if they are using enterprise. If they have just set up one root instance and run all applications/web sites off that root, then you are still SOL if one of

RE: check out this CS response

2006-02-09 Thread Ian Skinner
correct me if I'm wrong, but, if a hosting company used separate instances for their customers wouldn't they have to buy a separate license for each? Best, Chris No, the license is per 2/cpus per box, you can have as many websites as you are comfortable stuffing on that box under the CF