Could you expand upon your Railo configuration that was used in the test?
Were you using the Railix download or something different? If so...
- What servlet engine?
- What web server?
I think that both products have so many different ways to configure them that
it will be hard to get an accurate
I just posted this back on David's Blog, but I'll post here as well, for ayone
interested
==
Hi David,
Thanks for the information. Here's what we found in testing here at Adobe.
OVERVIEW: In all load tests here, we see ColdFusion 8 outperform Railo
everytime.
Testing Scenarios:
A
Interesting stuff.
One minor nit-pick - Apple Bootcamp is NOT virtualization software. It's
merely a tool to facilitate dual-booting. The OS runs fully natively on the
hardware.
On 8/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just posted this back on David's Blog,
> If anyone is having trouble coonecting to a (SQL 2000)
> datasource (as I was) and getting this error:
>
> [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Login
> failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a
> trusted SQL Server connection
>
> I found the solution: The probl
Andrew Grosset wrote:
> I found the solution: The problem is Windows XP SP2. The work around is to
> route your CF Admin Datasource connection through an MS ODBC socket, whatever
> that is... instructions can be found here:
>
> http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid
If anyone is having trouble coonecting to a (SQL 2000) datasource (as I was)
and getting this error:
[Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Login failed for user
'(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection
I found the solution: The problem is Windows XP
Actually it has (I had comment pre-moderation turned on, without
realising) - Damon, I've left you an email too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I posted this but it hasn't been published:
>
> =
> Itâs hardly fair to post a set of performance benchmarks without full op
I posted this but it hasn't been published:
=
Itâs hardly fair to post a set of performance benchmarks without full open
disclosure, including everything needed to reproduce the test results.
Please post all this and I can promise you the CF team will respond (I run it).
Thanks!
>This test appears to be a sequential set of requests. Unless you're only
>going to have one request at a time in your application, tests like these
>are one step away from useless. Tests need to run concurrent requests, not
>just sequential requests.
According to his followup comment on the blog,
> Interesting, I've always thought that CF connections to a
> database should/could be improved:
>
> http://david.low.me.uk/2007/06/25/another-cfml-speed-contest/
This test appears to be a sequential set of requests. Unless you're only
going to have one request at a time in your application, tes
Yeah, thats what I figured too Brain.
You are still sending an SQL statement to the database
CF still has to check for a connection to the db server and open one if
required
CF still has to wait for the data to come back
So the factor from CF side of things is how quickly it can get the SQL
state
Interesting, I've always thought that CF connections to a database should/could
be improved:
http://david.low.me.uk/2007/06/25/another-cfml-speed-contest/
Andrew.
~|
Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product
d
>Interesting, I've always thought that CF connections to a database should be
>improved:
I've been doing some testing with the Railo 2 beta as well to see how well
CFWebstore ran on it, and was likewise thrilled with how fast it is. Blazing
fast! I'm going to continue testing to make sure it do
Interesting, I've always thought that CF connections to a database should be
improved:
http://david.low.me.uk/2007/06/25/another-cfml-speed-contest/
Andrew.
~|
ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps
today, with easy PDF
Actually, in my experience using stored procedures provides negligible speed
improvements over cfquery. This is due to the fact that modern databases
cache execution plans and support prepared statements. There are reasons one
might want to use stored procedures, but speed increases over cfquery is
> Interesting, I've always thought that CF connections to a database should
be improved:
That cool, but any speed issues with CFQUERY are easily overcome by using
stored procedures. Been trying to move the them as much as possible.
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive services
Austin & Wi
16 matches
Mail list logo
