>Building the loop in or out of the CFQUERY tag makes no difference in
>performance.
My experience is that performance can be impacted slightly based on number of
users, number of terms, and complexity of the query as a result of the
parameters to be evaluated. We have found better overall perf
bject: Re: SQL Gurus... can this query be written more efficiently?
> Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster
> than forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
Building the loop in or out of the CFQUERY tag makes no
> Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster than
> forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
Building the loop in or out of the CFQUERY tag makes no difference in
performance.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.fi
Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster than
forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
trim(i) ">
(you'll need to cleanup the 'and' and 'or' to consider that the first time it
loops through to
build the search crit
>Take the following query. Is there a more efficient way to handle the where
>clause? Specifically, the last two 'and' statements that loop through two
>different lists, one that includes results and one that excludes results.
>Thanks, Che
>
>select searchterm, searchtype, numresults, timestamp
>f
Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster than
forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
trim(i) ">
(you'll need to cleanup the 'and' and 'or' to consider that the first time it
loops through to
build the search crit
With either solution I hope you have good indexes.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Carl Von Stetten wrote:
>
> Che,
>
> How about this:
>
> select searchterm, searchtype, numresults, timestamp
> fromusersearch
> where searchtype = cfsqltype="cf_sql_smallint">
>and numresults <>
Che,
How about this:
select searchterm, searchtype, numresults, timestamp
fromusersearch
where searchtype =
and numresults <>
searchterm like or
)
and searchterm NOT IN ()
)
order by searchtermcount desc
Also, I don't think you need the on the
Take the following query. Is there a more efficient way to handle the where
clause? Specifically, the last two 'and' statements that loop through two
different lists, one that includes results and one that excludes results.
Thanks, Che
select searchterm, searchtype, numresults, timestamp
from
9 matches
Mail list logo
