Is this specific to Microsoft's license, or in general?
I remember Lotus came in to the company I work at to Demo Dominio
server. One of their 'features' they said was that you could use 1 Oracle
named user license to handle unlimited connections by letting the dominio
server handle
users can use SQL7 at the same time. No Internet Connector
License needed, just 5 CALS.
Um Nice try, but that's illegal.
Is this specific to Microsoft's license, or in general?
I am unaware of the specifics for other platforms, but it is specifically
specified in the MS SQL
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 2:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
Any idea how much that runs?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Server
-
From: Zachary Bedell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 6:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well... Looks like M$ has changed their licensing strategy again,
but... Looking at the info from
a
lot of email every day, and I have a REALLY bad memory...
So I don't always remember everything that was said.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Mone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 2:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems to me that, for CF users, SQL7 is a much better buy.
In CF Administrator, you can limit the number of worker threads
(simultaneous connections) to 5, for example. This means at
most 5 CF
users can use SQL7 at the same time. No
Native Medical Center
-Original Message-
From: Zachary Bedell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 6:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:RE: SQL Server Licesning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well... Looks like M$ has
- Original Message -
From: "Zachary Bedell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:02 AM
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually, the standard edition is quite fine fo
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
That ain't quite correct. I think if you want to do anything beyond limited
SQL, you'll end up needing the $20K/cpu Enterprise Edition of SQL, which is
comparable to Oracle.
Either way, I think $20K/cpu is a miserable ripoff. In our instance, I have
a quad-processor
They need CALs for users who aren't anonymous, don't they?
best, paul
At 12:27 PM 11/17/00 -0700, you wrote:
Someone using SQL for just for web site hosting gets
shafted though, since he wasn't purchasing any CALs.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion
yep you can get an unlimited internet connectivity license.
! ---
Neil Clark
Senior Web Applications Engineer
mcb digital
Tel. +44 (0)20 8941 3232
Tel. +44 (0)20 8408 8131 [Direct]
http://www.mcbdigital.com
---
Any idea how much that runs?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Server Licesning
yep you can get an unlimited internet connectivity license.
! ---
Neil
I have a client who wants to instal SQL Server on a single processor
dedicated server (to host a web application)
Can anybody fill me in on what sort of licensing he'll need? I looked at
Microsofts site, but I seem to remember something about an Internet
Connectivity license, and I didn't see
13 matches
Mail list logo
