1. This is not a MM run or owned list. It is owned by me and run by myself and the community. When the community helps out with policing content, it makes my life easier.
2. NDA issues are always an important thing and there have been consequences when NDA has been broken in the past.
3. Discussion
Ben,
Thanks for making this clear. I may have (deliberately - sorry)
misinterpreted what Peter said:) I think this does definitely cover the
people who know nothing, aren't part of an NDA program, they can talk about
what the hell they like. The people who have signed the agreement, really
shou
ectly, but leave the list out of it. IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 5:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
To breach any NDA is quite a serious offence.
A serious breach has occurred.
I
Wouldn't this be more for the CF-Community area?
-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 8:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
Well, I interpreted this as that Peter knows that someone on the lis
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 7:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
apart from that, surely everyone would like something in the next version of
CF... MM might be working on it, and you might happen to discuss it in
here, not knowing... woul
???
>
> now I am very confused.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Howard Fore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
>
Fore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
> So in order to keep certain things secret, you publicly alert people
> who may not know they are talking about secret
My thoughts exactly, it's only natural to be curious after reading that and
sure enough it was pretty easy to find (probably) what is being referred too
-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2004 12:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Serious breach o
So in order to keep certain things secret, you publicly alert people
who may not know they are talking about secrets to the fact that
secrets are being discussed?
--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 14, 2004, at 5:24 AM, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> Knock any further discussion of the breach o
yes...quiteeh?
_
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2004 12:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 200
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 5:25 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Serious breach of NDA - a polite warning
>
> To breach any NDA is quite a serious offence.
>
> A serious breach has occurr
To breach any NDA is quite a serious offence.
A serious breach has occurred.
If you are already aware of the breach to the NDA do yourself a favour and forget about it. Do not replicate (re-publish) any information about it or a link to it. Do not discuss it on this list.
When MM are ready they
12 matches
Mail list logo
