On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
> Pls let us know what you find out if it is not included on this thread, if
> at all possible.
I've had a couple of private emails containing information I'm not
allowed to share because, well, they probably shouldn't have shared it
with me.
>> I'm genuinely interested in hearing from folks with insight into
government agency IT departments
As am I.
>>and so far the feedback has been very
positive (which is good).
Pls let us know what you find out if it is not included on this thread, if
at all possible.
Thank you sir,
G!
On Th
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
> Is this really that big of a deal? Or is that what you are trying to find
> out?
I'm genuinely interested in hearing from folks with insight into
government agency IT departments and so far the feedback has been very
positive (which is good
> Can you give some examples of CMS solutions that are losing support?
I don't know if I can get into specifics, but basically everything
that's not on that list is losing support.
>> CF has been in use by the federal government practically as long as
>> it's existed - we were working on governm
Is this really that big of a deal? Or is that what you are trying to find
out? According to the Adobe folks that sales were strong for CF 8 and that
the market share and/or numbers of developers is growing. Are we just
tormenting ourselves with another round of "CFID" related FUD?
thanx
G!
On We
At a big Gov agency I am fighting the good fight to implement Mura but the
superiors wana spend money on a CMS so they are looking at some CF COTS
products. It's a bummer cause I really LOVE Mura.
That said the agency is FOR SURE keeping ACF for its public facing stuff. On
the inside they are mix
I've been working with .GOV as a shared CF server admin since the
beginning of '06 for EPA, and the impression I've always been given is
that our branch is only interested in enterprise solutions. Even the
FOSS apps that are being run are the Enterprise variants (Solaris, RHEL,
etc). If ther
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
> Actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. They're not just
> "moving to Drupal" - they're limiting the vendors who can provide
> solutions for websites hosted by the US Senate Sergeant-at-Arms
Interesting. When I saw the list of consult
> They reference the Washington Post article about the House migrating
> 520 websites from "a mix of proprietary and open-source content
> management platforms" to Drupal.
Actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. They're not just
"moving to Drupal" - they're limiting the vendors who can p
We started using CF while I was working at HUD in 1997.
On 1/12/2011 8:53 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> The government has always been a pretty strong area for ColdFusion
> (does someone here know how long ColdFusion has been so deeply
> embedded in government? I get the impression it long predates
On 13 January 2011 12:53, Sean Corfield wrote:
> I don't want to start one of those interminable "CF is dying" threads
> but I am curious as to how many people had seen these stories and what
> they thought in the context of the US government following many other
> world governments in a push for
They should just switch to Railo and be instantly FOSS with CFML :)
FTR, I still love farcry as a CMS I find it's code base very nice to work
with and extend.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On Jan 12, 2011 8:54 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
I saw Blue River (the Mura folks
I saw Blue River (the Mura folks) tweet this today:
http://twitter.com/#!/brinteractive/statuses/25246946570534912
They reference the Washington Post article about the House migrating
520 websites from "a mix of proprietary and open-source content
management platforms" to Drupal.
The other day,
13 matches
Mail list logo