Does anyone know why this line errors out only in CF 5? The following
code is being run inside of a catch block:
"error occurred on Line #CFCATCH.TAGCONTEXT[1]["LINE"]# "
I could have sworn it worked in CF 4.5.1, but my memory is fading daily
on them good ol' days.
-
hi there.
can someone run this and tell me what you get? also, if you could, in your
reply, let me know if you have any hotfixes and/or patches in your
runtime/servers/lib directory? or if that directory exists at all for you?
select * from blahBlahBooey
thanks.
...tony
ton
I have a template with a multi-part update (several tables). I have the
entire process wrapped in and . After each individual
update, I have a . My question is if something fails, and I
, do I need to short-circut the rest of the
transaction, or does processing stop automatically?
I.E.:
hi there.
If im trying to cftry/cfcatch a webservice
that "may" or "may not" work 100%, don't ask, and all I want
is for it to be skipped if its not working, do I only need to
have a blank cfcatch pair, with nothing in between?
thanks!
tony
r e v o l u t i o n w e b d e s i g n
[EMAIL PROT
I have heard that cftry/cfcatch can add alot of overhead to page processing.
Is this ture?
Thanks,
Clint
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail
eries ...
Hope this helps
-Original Message-
From: Saidi; Marwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 August 2001 15:55
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFTRY/CFCATCH question
I have a template with a multi-part update (several tables). I have the
entire process wrapped in and . After
-Talk
Subject: RE: CFTRY/CFCATCH question
First, you can't put CFCATCH tags in the middle of a CFTRY. I has to be the
last tag in the CFTRY.
I would do need to do this:
... qu
> I have a template with a multi-part update (several tables). I have
> the entire process wrapped in and . After each
> individual update, I have a . My question is if something
> fails, and I , do I need to short-
> circuit the rest of the transaction, or does processing stop
> automatically
that one TRY/CATCH should be sufficient...
Once again, learn something (lots of things) daily on this list!
Thanks again!
Marwan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFTRY/CFCATCH question
>
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:52 AM
Subject: cftry/cfcatch question
> hi there.
>
> If im trying to cftry/cfcatch a webservice
> that "may" or "may not" work 100%, don't ask, and
!
...tony
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cftry/cfcatch question
afaik, that's all. there doesn't need to be anything between the
block.
but wouldn't you want to be setting s
Yes, you can also get a little fancy by nesting blocks inside the block of another . This would allow you to try a web service two or three times, or alternate web services or something before you gave up as unworkable.
do something
do something again
ahh yeahgood idea.
thanks!
...tony
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cftry/cfcatch question
Yes, you can also get a little fancy by nesting blocks inside
the block of another . This
Tony,
On 4/15/2004 at 11:52, you wrote:
TW> do I only need to have a blank cfcatch pair, with nothing in
TW> between?
This will suffice:
~ Ubqtous ~
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
excellent.
thanks.
...tony
-Original Message-
From: Ubqtous [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cftry/cfcatch question
Tony,
On 4/15/2004 at 11:52, you wrote:
TW> do I only need to have a blank cfcatch pair, with nothing in
220
> Washington DC 20036
> 202.797.6570 (direct line)
> www.figleaf.com
>
-Original Message-
From: Clint Tredway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cftry/cfcatch question
I have heard that cftry/cfcatch can add alot of over
16 matches
Mail list logo
