RE: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread Ken Wilson
;corfield.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? This topic is very off topic for CF-Talk. If this is a technical question, please repost under a different subject. Nice to see the thread-shifter works :) On Sunday, Oct 20, 2002, at 10:50 US

Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread Sean A Corfield
;corfield.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? This topic is very off topic for CF-Talk. If this is a technical question, please repost under a different subject. Nice to see the thread-shifter works :) On Sunday, Oct 20, 2002, at 10:50 US

Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? This topic is very off topic for CF-Talk. If this is a technical question, please repost under a different subject. Nice to see the thread-shifter works :) On Sunday, Oct 20, 2002, at 10:50 US/Pacific, S

Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 11:06 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: another it was never achieved -- but the docs have always reflected the desired functionality rather than the actual functionality. So we're agreed that it's a documentation bug then? ;) An Architect's View --

RE: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread Andy Clary
] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 11:06 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: another it was never achieved -- but the docs have always reflected the desired functionality rather than the actual functionality

Re: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 11:06 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: another it was never achieved -- but the docs have always reflected the desired functionality rather than the actual functionality. So we're agreed that it's a documentation bug then? ;) Hehe... Well, I'd prefer it be a

RE: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-22 Thread Ken Wilson
So it sounds like a doc bug Yes, it does appear that way. Named notation has never worked on any version as best I can recall. Of course, I'd prefer to think the docs are correct and it's just a minor bug in the server that needs correcting. Ken

cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?

2002-10-21 Thread Sean A Corfield
This topic is very off topic for CF-Talk. If this is a technical question, please repost under a different subject. Nice to see the thread-shifter works :) On Sunday, Oct 20, 2002, at 10:50 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: My only specific issue at the moment is to either have the