Wow! This has been a fun thread -- just what I need after a long day of ERP
work :)
First off, I'm a *big* MySQL fan. That said, there is a limited range of
things it's good for. Same for Oracle. Same for MSSQL, etc. Got a few
comments though:
> Funny how the most expensive solution (Oracle) and
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 8:25:27 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
> If you look at the methodology of the eWeek study (a link that seems
> to have been removed since I first read the article), you'll find a
> lot of fine print
I've looked all over eWeek's site and can't find the article you g
> Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 8:25:27 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
>
> > If you look at the methodology of the eWeek study (a link that seems
> > to have been removed since I first read the article), you'll find a
> > lot of fine print
>
>
> I've looked all over eWeek's site and can't find t
bject: Re: eweek MySQL vs Oracle, etc (Re: WOT: MySQL in the
Enterprise)
> Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 8:25:27 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
>
> > If you look at the methodology of the eWeek study (a link that seems
> > to have been removed since I first read the article)
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 9:24:51 AM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
> eWeek does that for every article with statistics that I've ever
> really wanted to read -- details are there, then gone. grr.
Well, looks like this might be it:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,808852,00.asp
Yesterd
If you have hard copies, the story was in the January 6, 2003 edition on
page 16.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: eweek MySQL vs Oracle, etc (Re: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise)
Was this
6 matches
Mail list logo
