> Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 8:25:27 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > If you look at the methodology of the eWeek study (a link that seems
> > to have been removed since I first read the article), you'll find a
> > lot of fine print
> <snip>
>
> I've looked all over eWeek's site and can't find the article you guys
> are talking about. Anyone got the URL?
>
> Thanks.

I saw the original article on /. the day it came out -- and there was a link
right at the bottom on methodology. Wanted to chime in about that on this
discussion and link is gone. eWeek does that for every article with
statistics that I've ever really wanted to read -- details are there, then
gone. grrrrrr. In the text of the article that's still there, they mention
the MySQL folks tuning it and the 2/3 performance drop and the JDBC drivers
for MSSQL.

Of course they still have the link for the zip of all the code :)

>
> --
> Chris Montgomery        monty @ airtightweb.com
> Airtight Web Services   http://www.airtightweb.com
> Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales
> 210-490-2415
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to