A week or so ago I peeked at the PostGreSQL web site and looked over
their Windows port. All of the "Experimental" and "total rewrite" and
"not fully tested" messages convinced me to keep waiting, as my needs
are for full production.
But from the sound of it some of you out there have bitten the
Matt Robertson wrote:
> A week or so ago I peeked at the PostGreSQL web site and looked over
> their Windows port. All of the "Experimental" and "total rewrite" and
> "not fully tested" messages convinced me to keep waiting, as my needs
> are for full production.
The PostgreSQL hackers do not con
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: mySQL to PostGreSQL on Windows (was Pro/Con Moving from MSSQL
to MySQL)
> Matt Robertson wrote:
>> A week or so
> I use mySQL primarily in production, although I have
> clients using MS SQL and work in it a fair bit every
> day. The code I write has to *always* port
> interchangeably between these two platforms,
> as well as Access and Oracle, so I don't get fancy
> with *any* platform's functions.
You mig
Jim McAtee wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk"
>Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:39 PM
>Subject: Re: mySQL to PostGreSQL on Windows (was Pro/Con Moving from MSSQL
>to MySQL)
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo