ch.
Hope this helps,
Jenny
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:rick.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 July 2010 20:37
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Mail servers
I've been using MDaemon for years and found that it works great.
Other mail servers I've used and didn't much c
I've been using MDaemon for years and found that it works great.
Other mail servers I've used and didn't much care for include
Coolfusion IMS Lite and Gordano NTMail (way long time ago). Been
using MDaemon for 8 years now here at Duke as a small departmental
mail server (now it serves exclusively
>> Curious about current experiences with e-mail server
>> software before I start looking around for better licensing terms.
Thanks!
We've been using Visnetic Mail Server (windows) which is essentially a
re-packaged Merak or IceWarp Mail server and have had very good luck with
it. It has a full
I used to use MailEnable. It was pretty full featured and worked fine. I had
no complaints except for dealing with log files and spam. Even with DNS
black lists enable I used to get TONS of spam. That was a number of years
ago so things may be different, I am not in the hosting biz anymore so I
l
>>I'm curious what you're running and how happy you are with it.
I'm using MailEnable. Works well except for infinite loops from time to
time, very hard to know why.
It is an interesting question, I'd like to know if some one is using a
solution that allows creation of new accounts from CF ?
I run MailEnable. I setup the server a couple of years ago and I never have to
do anything to it just add new account.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Scott [mailto:jsc...@gravityfree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:43 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: (ot) Mail servers
For those out
>For those out there who actually run e-mail servers for your clients, I'm
>curious what you're running and how happy you are with it.
Had the following interface-related issues w/ SmarterMail 6:
- mail items getting dropped into wrong folders (when using drag-drop)
- drag-drop would sometimes in
-Original Message-
From: Marc Funaro [mailto:subscripti...@advantex.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:32 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Mail servers
SmarterMail has been GREAT. I switched from a customized qmail solution,
and smartermail can handle joe-jobs really well, has great anti-spam
SmarterMail has been GREAT. I switched from a customized qmail solution, and
smartermail can handle joe-jobs really well, has great anti-spam configuration
and customization per-domain, and uses ClamAV for killing viruses dead.
Outbound spam mitigation too.
Combined with the ActiveSync licen
"It" being smarterMail.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
> Speaking as an occasional user of the web client I can say it's a fairly
> intuitive gui. Except for the location of a few buttons I find it pretty
> good.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Ben Conner wrote:
>
>
Speaking as an occasional user of the web client I can say it's a fairly
intuitive gui. Except for the location of a few buttons I find it pretty
good.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Ben Conner wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> I've been using Smartermail for a little over a year now and have been
> p
Hi Justin,
I've been using Smartermail for a little over a year now and have been
pretty happy with it. It's fairly complete, feature-wise, and very
efficient. And the company continues to actively enhance it and kill
bugs whenever found.
--Ben
On 7/6/2010 5:43 PM, Justin Scott wrote:
> Fo
For those out there who actually run e-mail servers for your clients, I'm
curious what you're running and how happy you are with it. We're currently
using modusMail for Windows here, but it's been years since I took a look at
the e-mail server landscape. So what's hot right now? SmarterMail?
MD
interfax.net - used and recommend.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 5, 2006 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: mail to fax?
You may want to look at efax.com. They accept an email with an attachments,
and then send the attachment as a fax
Working on automating faxes myself. I plan to generate and store pdf's
of invoices and use one of the following services: (cut and paste from
an internal email)
Fax Services
Innoport
http://www.innoport.com/services_features_business.asp
Outbound Web Service 8 cents/page. Corporate customers get
disclaimer: I haven't ever used this service.
Intermedia offers this as part of their hosting plan. Like I said, I've
never used it, but every time I log in, the advertisement is there.
http://intermedia.net/it-professionals/web-hosting/add-on-services/web-hosting-fax-via-email.asp
or
htt
I have worked with eFax, the system works pretty well, but the customer
service can really be a pain.
All the same I would reccommend them. It does work really well.
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~~
You may want to look at efax.com. They accept an email with an attachments, and
then send the attachment as a fax.
hth,
larry
--
Larry C. Lyons
Web Analyst
BEI Resources
American Type Culture Collection
email: llyons(at)atcc(dot)org
tel: 703.365.2700.2678
--
>I've got a client with a loan appl
I've got a client with a loan application form on her site. She'd like the
processing of the form to be sent to her as a fax. Not really sure why, but
does anyone know of, or have, something like this?
I think it can be done, but I've never used anything of this nature before.
Personally I use SmarterMail on my own mail servers, sitting behind the open
source ASSP antispam gateway. Takes some jiggering to get it to work like
that. Among other things you have to use a separate mail server for CF. I
would have bought IMS_SE for that if I didn't already have an IMail licens
How about IMS (http://www.coolfusion.com)? It's a CF-based POP mail server,
it's fast, and the House of Fusion lists run on it.
Judith
>|
>| Sendmail.
>
>I assume that it is a IMAP/POP3 server that Cedric is after. Sendmail is
>only a SMTP server (transfer agent - windows has one built in, I thi
I've used Merak before too -- not too shabby.
Derek Vinyard wrote:
>merak is what i use..
>
>On 9/19/05, Cedric Villat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
>>open-source, but paid solution will work too. I checked on source
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:07 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT: Mail server
>
> Free would be mailenable www.mailenable.com. You'd have to add horde or
> squirrel mail for w
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Mail server
merak is what i use..
On 9/19/05, Cedric Villat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
open-source, but paid solu
merak is what i use..
On 9/19/05, Cedric Villat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
> open-source, but paid solution will work too. I checked on sourceforge, but
> really didn't have much luck finding a Windows server. I just ne
| -Original Message-
| From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server?
| > Preferably open-source,
|
| Sendmail.
I assume that it is a IMAP/POP3 server that Cedric is after. Sendmail is
only a SMTP server (transfer agent
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 17:07, Russ wrote:
> Since when does sendmail run on windows?
Oh, you know, since about 5 or ten years ago :-)
It's just code - you can compile it anywhere.
Cygwin even have a cute little set of packages and a management app for adding
and removing them.
I use GN
We use MailEnable Professional. It does what we need and is getting
better all the time. The standard version is free though I would
suggest the Professional version which is only a couple of hundred
dollars. It has gotten much better recently with its new flitering and
SPF options. The only thing
ows?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:11 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: OT: Mail server
>
>On Tuesday 20 September 2005 00:24, Cedric Villat wrote:
>
>
>>What do you guys recomm
Since when does sendmail run on windows?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Mail server
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 00:24, Cedric Villat wrote:
> What do you guys recommend a
Cedric,
We've been using MDaemon in our department for a long time. It's fairly
inexpensive too if you don't have a whole lot of accounts.
www.mdaemon.com
Rick
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Tro
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 00:24, Cedric Villat wrote:
> What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
> open-source,
Sendmail.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
~|
Logware (www.lo
I use XMail:
http://www.xmailserver.org/
It is open source, cross-platform, and relatively easy to configure and
administer. There are lots of free plugins available for Windows installations,
including A-V filters for popular A-V programs, and a very cool program called
SCOPE, a Perl engine t
irst place?
>
>Russ
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:29 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: OT: Mail server
>
>Smartermail.
> http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/Default.aspx
> It&#
x27;re set. And you won't have the
performance/security issues of smartermail.
Why are you looking to host it on windows in the first place?
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Smartermail.
http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/Default.aspx
It's not free, but it is pretty cheap and it works really well.
On 9/19/05, Cedric Villat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
> open-source, but p
What do you guys recommend as a good Windows-based mail server? Preferably
open-source, but paid solution will work too. I checked on sourceforge, but
really didn't have much luck finding a Windows server. I just need a basic mail
server, that allows for multiple users and webmail, at a minimum.
ill retrieve their old mail.
> - Original Message -
> From: Alan Rafael Bleiweiss
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 7:11 AM
> Subject: Yet another OT Mail Relay move questionDoes anyone have any
> experience in how to move pending email
> to
-
From: Alan Rafael Bleiweiss
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 7:11 AM
Subject: Yet another OT Mail Relay move questionDoes anyone have any experience in how to move pending email
to the new server? (I've got fifty virtual domains...)
[Todays Threads]
[This Me
FINALLY I'm moving to IMail from Post.Office because my being listed on
spam lists
has caused me massive difficulties.
Does anyone have any experience in how to move pending email
to the new server? (I've got fifty virtual domains...) THe IMail system
only allows importing if both are live serv
Does anyone know of a low learning curve, out of the box Linux Mail
server (POP and IMAP capable) with an add-on webmail utility,
preferrably customizable?
Cutter
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?for
D]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ot mail
>
> You can do this by sending a multipart Mime message. The CFX_imsmail
> custom
> tags makes this really easy. You just pass an htmlbody and a textbody
and
> the tag will build the mime boun
at kinds of "things" are we talking about?
>
> -- jon
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tipton Josh (orl1jdt) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:16 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: ot mail
>
>
>I think I have seen this question befo
2002 12:35 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ot mail
>
> It might be possible to do it in MIME, depending on their mail
reader...
> what kinds of "things" are we talking about?
>
> -- jon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tipton Josh (orl1jdt) [mailto:
It might be possible to do it in MIME, depending on their mail reader...
what kinds of "things" are we talking about?
-- jon
-Original Message-
From: Tipton Josh (orl1jdt) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ot mail
I think I have seen this question before but how can you hide certain things
in an email if someone does not have html email?
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the
> Someone else on this list recommended VOPMail and I was simply pointing
out
> that VOPMail has a known problem with RBL's that you might want to watch
out
> for. As to why Vircom leaves that spam hole open, is probably a topic for
> off this list.
Steve,
Again, filtering by the RCPTO command i
VOPMail from Vircom (www.vircom.com) is an excellent product with great
support and a reasonable price. We ran SLMail for several years but
switched to VOPMail as it offered better support for multiple domains.
John
www.cornells.com
-Original Message-
At 02:55 PM 10/30/00 -0500, Brad R
We like SLMail from SeattleLabs.
At 02:55 PM 10/30/00 -0500, Brad Roberts wrote:
>We are getting ready to set up our server and need a mail server package.
>Anyone have suggestions? Running Win2k, 733mhz, 512meg ram. Would like to
>stay under $1000 with unlimited email accounts.
>
>Thanks,
>
>B
We are getting ready to set up our server and need a mail server package.
Anyone have suggestions? Running Win2k, 733mhz, 512meg ram. Would like to
stay under $1000 with unlimited email accounts.
Thanks,
Brad
CTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: mail transfer agents
At 04:27 PM 7/14/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Watch out when using cfmail on solaris (and more than likely linux as
>well) when sending via a qmail SMTP server. I recently found that the
>m
At 04:27 PM 7/14/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Watch out when using cfmail on solaris (and more than likely linux as
>well) when sending via a qmail SMTP server. I recently found that the
>messages wouldn't go out because of bare linefeeds. CF would return the
>messages to the coldfusion/mail/undelivr f
Watch out when using cfmail on solaris (and more than likely linux as
well) when sending via a qmail SMTP server. I recently found that the
messages wouldn't go out because of bare linefeeds. CF would return the
messages to the coldfusion/mail/undelivr folder. The workaround was to
save the entire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
>I need to set up my own mail transfer agent (MTA) to accept outbound mail
>from CF, as the local infrastructure only supports authenticated SMTP. My
>traffic level is relatively low, hundreds of message per day max. I would
>put it on a dedicated box, and want to config
At 10:51 14/07/00 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
>I need to set up my own mail transfer agent (MTA) to accept outbound mail
>from CF, as the local infrastructure only supports authenticated SMTP. My
>traffic level is relatively low, hundreds of message per day max. I would
>put it on a dedicat
Will the Post.Office free download do what you want?
www.software.com
best, paul
At 10:51 AM 7/14/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I need to set up my own mail transfer agent (MTA) to accept outbound mail
>from CF, as the local infrastructure only supports authenticated SMTP. My
>traffic level is relativ
>I need to set up my own mail transfer agent (MTA) to accept outbound mail
>from CF, as the local infrastructure only supports authenticated SMTP. My
>traffic level is relatively low, hundreds of message per day max. I would
>put it on a dedicated box, and want to configure it to only accept ma
I need to set up my own mail transfer agent (MTA) to accept outbound mail
from CF, as the local infrastructure only supports authenticated SMTP. My
traffic level is relatively low, hundreds of message per day max. I would
put it on a dedicated box, and want to configure it to only accept mail fr
Does anyone know of any email servers that will scale to several million
mailboxes (about 3-5 million)?
Thanks
Steve
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/inde
D]
> Subject: [OT] This Mailing List (WAS [OT] Mail Delay ?)
>
>
> I apologize for the off-topic mail in advance. Off-topic mail
> sucks, and to
> send one knowing it's off-topic is a very bad thing, but I can't
> resist this
> time.
>
> I for one love this lis
I hope that you are keeping track of the problematic domains and trying
to contact the people whose email is causing a problem. I know that
there is some ickiness in my headers that would require changing email
clients to fix (and that is no guarantee). Although it would be a pain,
I would rather
tangible list expenses out of pocket
(if I'm technically wrong, I'm sure the lion's share comes straight from
their bank account). Unselfishness rocks.
I apologize for my arrogance in sending this. Arrogance sucks.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto
Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Mail Delay ?
I looked over the queued message base and didn't see any from your
domain. I
did see some things like:
*2 Message(s) queued for delphi.com
*R
. If that's a part of the cause of the poor performance, then
> I would think you'd be concerned. I've got no problem with someone
> posting a virus warning, but why the hell does it need to generate 25
> replies? It's gotten completely out of hand.
>
> Jim
&
posting a virus warning, but why the hell does it need to generate 25
replies? It's gotten completely out of hand.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, May 20, 2000 10:27 PM
Subj
In most cases, the mail to/from the list will show up anywhere from less
than a minute to about 10 or so, counting on list traffic. If the list has a
problem communicating with your local mailserver, the message will be cached
for later sending, which is done after an hour. It can either be a prob
Len, no disrespect intended, but I do accept help when offered and have
answered you a number of times in the past. All I ever seem to get from you
is public complaints (emailing me first and then the list 7 minutes later is
a perfect example). I've sent the DNS issues to my ISP, but I fail to see
>It's because there are a ton of people subscribed to the list and the
>list is hosted on a server that could use an upgrade. It has a tendency
>to get bogged down.
>
>So who wants to pitch in to buy Michael a new server?
Wrong approach.
He could keep his current server for the locgical list pr
As I noted yesterday,
there's no delay if you post during Happy Hour ;-)
best, paul
At 04:42 PM 5/20/00 -0500, you wrote:
>GE wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I know this is off topic but I am new to this list and would like to
> > know: why is there a 2+ hour delay for messages ?
>
>It's beca
GE wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I know this is off topic but I am new to this list and would like to
> know: why is there a 2+ hour delay for messages ?
It's because there are a ton of people subscribed to the list and the
list is hosted on a server that could use an upgrade. It has a tendency
to
Shows the value of posting during Happy Hour ;-)
best, paul
At 06:28 PM 5/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
>For the record, this message took only 10 minutes.
>
>best, paul
>
>At 06:17 PM 5/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Well, THAT's not why. When I post a message to the
> >swynk lists, I see it in minute
For the record, this message took only 10 minutes.
best, paul
At 06:17 PM 5/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Well, THAT's not why. When I post a message to the
>swynk lists, I see it in minutes (literally).
>
>Round trip here takes longer, sometimes much longer.
>I'm not complaining, just clarifying.
Well, THAT's not why. When I post a message to the
swynk lists, I see it in minutes (literally).
Round trip here takes longer, sometimes much longer.
I'm not complaining, just clarifying. I've run
enough list servers to know what a pain they can be.
Have a good weekend.
best, paul
At 09:05
If you mean "delay in seeing your own posts" kind of delay, talk to the people
who manage your SMTP server.
At 04:12 PM 5/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I know this is off topic but I am new to this list and would like to
>know: why is there a 2+ hour delay for messages ?
>
>thanks,
>Nels
Hello all,
I know this is off topic but I am new to this list and would like to
know: why is there a 2+ hour delay for messages ?
thanks,
Nelson
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
ht
75 matches
Mail list logo
