Re: site performance questions

2002-03-05 Thread Frank Mamone
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:24 PM Subject: Re: site performance questions > If you have to choose between more than a couple of items use CFSWITCH, whi > ch is a pretty straightforward case evaluation tool th

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Ben Forta
questions sure -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: site performance questions Just wait till I get a moment to finish it. :) Actually, could you and anyone else who read it email me off list to

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
sure -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: site performance questions Just wait till I get a moment to finish it. :) Actually, could you and anyone else who read it email me off list to tell me

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Gilbert Midonnet
wow thx for all the feedback. I guess I have some more reading to do. -- glm --- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, pro

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
ch 04, 2002 2:33 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: site performance questions > > >And if your not outputting data use CFSCRIPT. if statements and assignments > are basically faster in CFSCRIPT (but case statements are slower). >http://www.houseoffusion.com/docs/cfscript.htm >(these do

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
Michael, hey - thanks for that link. It's a great resource for cfscript. Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:33 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: site performance questions And if your not outputting data use CFS

Re: functions instead of operators on strings (WAS: site performance questions)

2002-03-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
This was covered here: http://www.fusionauthority.com/alert/index.cfm?alertid=5#Tech2 I have a table of different comparison types and the times they took as well as the reasoning behind each comparison type. At 05:44 PM 3/4/02, you wrote: >Found the following set of guidelines useful: > >> http

functions instead of operators on strings (WAS: site performance questions)

2002-03-04 Thread Gyrus
Found the following set of guidelines useful: > http://www.fusionauthority.com/alert/index.cfm?alertid=9#Tech1 But - Michael or anyone else - can you explain the bit that says "e. Use functions when doing TEXT comparisons in CFIF - Any time you're doing a comparison between a TEXT value and any

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
destination!!" > > > >Doug Brown >- Original Message - >From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:17 PM >Subject: Re: site performance questions > >

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
round this list has said that iif() is SLOWER than >cfif... > >> Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif() >> instead of a bunch of >> >> >> >> >> Doug Brown >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gilb

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Douglas Brown
Monday, March 04, 2002 2:17 PM Subject: Re: site performance questions > Or not as IIF() is a lot slower than plain CFIF. I'd rather have a bunch of > bulky CFIF statements on a page than have a smaller looking statement that > slows it down. > http://www.fusionauthority.com/a

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Matt Robertson
der using iif() > instead of a bunch of > > > > > Doug Brown > - Original Message - > From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM > Subject: site performance

RE: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Joseph DeVore
04, 2002 2:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: site performance questions Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif() instead of a bunch of Doug Brown - Original Message - From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[E

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
e issues, but you could consider using iif() >instead of a bunch of > > > > >Doug Brown >- Original Message - >From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Tony Schreiber
t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM > Subject: site performance questions > > > > I'm redesigning a site and I have questions regarding how the use of > > and affects performance. &g

Re: site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Douglas Brown
Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif() instead of a bunch of Doug Brown - Original Message - From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM Subject: si

site performance questions

2002-03-04 Thread Gilbert Midonnet
I'm redesigning a site and I have questions regarding how the use of and affects performance. 1. I have a drop-down navigation in a top frame. I would like to put the graphics in the nav to change according to the section the user is in and am wondering about how my alternatives affect load tim