Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Andrew Grosset
>>> Amen to this! I can't count the number of times I've seen a beautiful > >I am sure that this has never happened to any of us. > >http://theoatmeal.com/comics/design_hell > >G! > >On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jas > >> ~|

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Gerald Guido
>> Amen to this! I can't count the number of times I've seen a beautiful >> design get completely hosed I am sure that this has never happened to any of us. http://theoatmeal.com/comics/design_hell G! On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jason Fisher wrote: > > > Yeah, clients are always going

RE: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Mark A. Kruger
: cf-talk Subject: Re: wireframe for developers I use Balsamiq Mockups. http://balsamiq.com/products/mockups G! On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > > Ultimately it's whatever works best for you. The nice part of wireframing > is > that it clearly defines y

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Jason Fisher
> Yeah, clients are always going to want to know what it's going to "look like." However, I've found it extremely helpful to segregate > the wireframing from the design. > In my experience, most clients put the cart before the horse, concentrating way too much (or too early, or both) on the a

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Jason Fisher
+1 for Balsamiq. Less about design and more about wireframing the layout and functional fell before writing actual code. From: "Tom McNeer" Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:55 AM To: "cf-talk" Subject: Re: wireframe for develo

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Joel Watson
Yeah, clients are always going to want to know what it's going to "look like." However, I've found it extremely helpful to segregate the wireframing from the design. In my experience, most clients put the cart before the horse, concentrating way too much (or too early, or both) on the aesthet

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Justin Scott
> I use Balsamiq Mockups. I use Balamiq as well and have had pretty good success with it. I tend to use mockups to create clickable wireframes of what a site will do rather than how it will look. The mockup may have some basic layout logic in place but that usually changes quite a bit when the

RE: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Rick Faircloth
That's true. However, before my client's decide they always want to know "what is this going to look like?"... -Original Message- From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:48 AM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: wireframe for develope

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Michael Grant
Absolutely. Which is wireframing without a computer. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Casey Dougall < ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > > > > > Ultimately it's whatever works best for you. The nice part of wireframing > > is > >

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Tom McNeer
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Gerald Guido wrote: > > I use Balsamiq Mockups. > Me, too. -- Thanks, Tom Tom McNeer MediumCool http://www.mediumcool.com 1735 Johnson Road NE Atlanta, GA 30306 404.589.0560 ~| Order the

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Casey Dougall
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > > Ultimately it's whatever works best for you. The nice part of wireframing > is > that it clearly defines your layout before you've used any of your design > budget. That way you don't have to redesign anything if the layout you > propose

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Gerald Guido
e over using Photoshop? > > > > Rick > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:rcam...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:34 AM > > To: cf-talk > > Subject: Re: wireframe for developers > >

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Michael Grant
ketcher" > route over using Photoshop? > > Rick > > -Original Message- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:rcam...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:34 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: wireframe for developers > > > http://wireframesketcher.com

RE: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Rick Faircloth
Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:34 AM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: wireframe for developers http://wireframesketcher.com/ I reviewed it here: http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2010/12/21/Review-WireframeSketcher On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:52 AM, John M Bliss wrote: > > What's your cu

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Cameron Childress
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > OmniGraffle Pro is what I use. Ditto. -Cameron ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=house

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Michael Grant
OmniGraffle Pro is what I use. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:52 AM, John M Bliss wrote: > > What's your current favorite wireframe development tool? > > -- > John Bliss - http://about.me/jbliss > > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusio

Re: wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread Raymond Camden
http://wireframesketcher.com/ I reviewed it here: http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2010/12/21/Review-WireframeSketcher On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:52 AM, John M Bliss wrote: > > What's your current favorite wireframe development tool? > > -- > John Bliss - http://about.me/jbliss > > > ~~

wireframe for developers

2011-01-18 Thread John M Bliss
What's your current favorite wireframe development tool? -- John Bliss - http://about.me/jbliss ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Arc