I only use cfscript to improve the speed of thingsHow so?you mean writing it??as cfml hasn't been any slower then cfscript since mx came out. back in the olden days cfscript was faster but these days its all compiled to the same old byte code
M@
Oh, and did you know you could do this
cfscript
s = a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k;
z = s.split(,); // this line, here
for (i = 1; i LT 5; i=i+1) {
writeoutput (hello z[i] br);
}
while (i LTE arrayLen(z)) {
writeoutput (testing z[i] br);
i=i+1;
}
/cfscript
Yes, that is
Three things right with Tag based code
1. It cuts time for doing complex functions (checking mail, FTP etc)
2. It's easy to create structured code without having to inherit this and
public that
3. It doesn't mess up the look of the file (that much anyway)
I only use cfscript to improve the
Hi all,
XP SP2, IIS, SQL Server.
I have a full flash app that relies
heavily on flash remoting calls to my CFCs. We just upgraded all our boxes to
CF7 from 6.1 to find that when the app makes multiple consecutive remoting
calls only a percentage of them return. Unfortunately it is
For
some things it seems a lot faster, especially when there's a lot of processing
involved of structs and arrays etc. But not everything I guess.. Usually the
code starts off in tags and if I see that it's running a bit slow I change it to
cfscript.. Sometimes it runs a bit faster.. I
Woot! converting tag based syntax into cfscript makes the code run
faster? I've never heard that one before...
On 5/11/06, Joel Cass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some things it seems a lot faster, especially when there's a lot of
processing involved of structs and arrays etc. But not
Mark,
Well pre CFMX the cfscript did used to run faster, but now that it is Java based for Coldfusion this argument is now debatable.
On 5/11/06, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woot! converting tag based syntax into cfscript makes the code runfaster? I've never heard that one before...
On
