SOLVED: It looks like the best way to setup 301's is in ISAPI ReWrite.
This tool allows you to re-write any URL and therefore in my example I
can easily map index.cfm?product=abc to index.cfm?product=def
The downfall of setting up 301's directly in the IIS manager is that
you have to keep the fil
Hi Matthew,
I'm guessing a bit about how your app works, but I'd think, the code
snippet listed earlier should work fine if you use URL rewrites-
http://www.new-url.com/blah/products/def
product=def">
From the perspective of the search engine - their crawler sends a get
to www.domain.com
Hi Sean,
Thanks for the interesting history!
In regards to using ISAPI ReWrite; I thought of using this (in fact I
will be on a new project) however I don't think that it would still
solve my problem, because to create a 301 in IIS it is my
understanding that you open up IIS, right click on the
Matthew - The relevant RFC (1738) was written in '94 and includes a
whole bunch of specifications for gopher. Nobody was really doing what
your doing on the web in 94.
RFC 2616 defines 301's and was written in 99 - and even then, the sort
of complex data display that you're dealing with was pr
This was one of the most detailed resources I found on parking and
redirects and discusses how you can wildcard the queries for IIS
http://www.mcanerin.com/EN/articles/301-redirect-IIS.asp
sarah
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ma
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the feedback.
BRETT/ANDREW: you're right, my problem is that SE's are trying to
spider to this page (and cloging up my inbox with errors) hence why I
want to 301 so that the SE's learn about the new page.
SEAN: what you've said makes sense but out of interest how else woul
At a protocol level - a change in the search part value does not
constitute a permanent move. The RFC's defining status codes, URL
layouts and etc weren't written with applications that use query strings
to generate completely differentiated content from the same page in
mind. What you're appl
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brett Payne-Rhodes
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2007 12:31 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: 301 redirect based on Query String
I'd be wondering whether this is really a 301 problem though. Isn't it just
that the product no lon
I'd be wondering whether this is really a 301 problem though. Isn't it just
that the product no longer exists? index.cfm still exists. Is there some danger
that search engines will start to drop indexes for your index.cfm urls?
Like I said... just wondering out loud really...
B)
Matthew wrote
Your assumption is correct.
Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2007 11:5
10 matches
Mail list logo
