@@ -573,6 +573,11 @@ struct EmptyCoverageMappingBuilder : public
CoverageMappingBuilder {
/// creation.
struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
+ struct DecisionIDPair {
+MCDCConditionID TrueID = 0;
+MCDCConditionID FalseID = 0;
+ };
chapuni wrote:
@@ -663,54 +668,40 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
private:
CodeGenModule
- llvm::SmallVector AndRHS;
- llvm::SmallVector OrRHS;
- llvm::SmallVector NestLevel;
+ llvm::SmallVector DecisionStack;
llvm::DenseMap
llvm::DenseMap
MCDCConditionID NextID = 1;
@@ -722,6 +713,9 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
return I->second;
}
+ /// Return the LHS Decision ([0,0] if not set).
+ const DecisionIDPair back() const { return DecisionStack.back(); }
chapuni wrote:
I think this may be byref as far as the
@@ -1884,20 +1874,28 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
}
void VisitBinLOr(const BinaryOperator *E) {
-// Keep track of Binary Operator and assign MCDC condition IDs
+bool IsRootNode = MCDCBuilder.isIdle();
+
+// Keep track of Binary Operator and assign
@@ -663,54 +668,40 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
private:
CodeGenModule
- llvm::SmallVector AndRHS;
- llvm::SmallVector OrRHS;
- llvm::SmallVector NestLevel;
+ llvm::SmallVector DecisionStack;
chapuni wrote:
I meant; `llvm::SmallVector` w/o the
@@ -730,68 +723,70 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
return;
// If binary expression is disqualified, don't do mapping.
-if (NestLevel.empty() &&
-!MCDCBitmapMap.contains(CodeGenFunction::stripCond(E)))
+if (!isBuilding() &&
https://github.com/chapuni commented:
Almost good, thanks!
Could you mention the issue #77873 in the description or in the subject?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78202
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78202
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DamonFool wrote:
> Is there a reason you put this first? Otherwise IMO it is slightly neater to
> put it last.
This bug had been fixed here:
```
commit 1b60ddd920e0caadfa85cc7013b559d6453d7e3e
Author: Jie Fu
Date: Thu Jan 18 07:34:09 2024 +0800
[Hurd] Fix -Wswitch in
sthibaul wrote:
> Is there a reason you put this first?
No particular reason.
> Otherwise IMO it is slightly neater to put it last.
Done so.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/sthibaul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
>From 15e157e3f7a6beb0b8be36ad1a9dbe3d2079eecf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Thibault
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:18:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] hurd: Fix build with -Werror,-Wswitch
We do not handle all
Ah, no worries - thanks for being aware of it & I get we're all having some
teething problems with github, etc.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 3:36 PM Erich Keane wrote:
> yeah, something weird happened with this one that i haven't figured out
> yet. This was a response to a review comment, and was
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
Is there a reason you put this first? Otherwise IMO it is slightly neater to
put it last.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
sthibaul wrote:
> Drive-by: is the `llvm_unreachable` actually unreachable? I.e. we never call
> this function with this case?
Hurd triplets are only defined for x86 and x86_64.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/rampitec closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fmayer wrote:
Drive-by: is the `llvm_unreachable` actually unreachable? I.e. we never call
this function with this case? Otherwise we are introducing UB in `NDEBUG` builds
```
/// In NDEBUG builds, if the platform does not support a builtin unreachable
/// then we call an internal LLVM runtime
https://github.com/rampitec updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78492
>From 01af6c9d8e80b810bbdec35dee38b1cf5d73cfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stanislav Mekhanoshin
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:07:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [AMDGPU] Sign extend simm16 in setreg intrinsic
We
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78384
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Freddy Ye
Date: 2024-01-18T09:22:04+08:00
New Revision: f3a4de395c167aeb8207294222c6ff5719ef6f62
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3a4de395c167aeb8207294222c6ff5719ef6f62
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3a4de395c167aeb8207294222c6ff5719ef6f62.diff
sthibaul wrote:
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fmayer wrote:
This broke Sanitizer bots:
```
[5/25] Building CXX object
tools/clang/lib/Driver/CMakeFiles/obj.clangDriver.dir/ToolChains/Hurd.cpp.o
FAILED:
tools/clang/lib/Driver/CMakeFiles/obj.clangDriver.dir/ToolChains/Hurd.cpp.o
CCACHE_CPP2=yes CCACHE_HASHDIR=yes /usr/bin/ccache
https://github.com/tstellar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69523
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kito-cheng wrote:
It tagged with 0.1 now :)
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-b/releases/tag/v0.1
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76893
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78492
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zygoloid commented:
We've discussed this before, years ago. Previously, the sticking point was: how
is LLVM going to know what the frontend considers the closest surrounding
subobject to be? The LLVM type doesn't give you that information, and it seems
like there's nowhere
@@ -80,17 +80,17 @@ OutOfLineDefs::foo(int, int, int) {
// LINUX: define dso_local noundef i32 @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.S
// LINUX: define dso_local noundef i32 @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.R
// LINUX: define weak_odr ptr @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.resolver()
-// LINUX: ret
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 8947469ec1ad6d35b2feec0acc43d0d191514f0b
ab13650e232b1a17cf9c7335f90a33f7eb71f741 --
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ cl::opt ProfiledBinary(
"profiled-binary", cl::init(""),
cl::desc("Path to binary from which the profile was collected."),
cl::sub(ShowSubcommand), cl::sub(MergeSubcommand));
-cl::opt DebugInfoFilename(
-"debug-info", cl::init(""),
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
The second argument of __builtin_dynamic_object_size controls whether it
returns the size of the whole object or the closest
@@ -2256,6 +2256,10 @@ class UnsafeBufferUsageReporter : public
UnsafeBufferUsageHandler {
Range = UO->getSubExpr()->getSourceRange();
MsgParam = 1;
}
+} else if (const auto *CtorExpr = dyn_cast(Operation)) {
+ S.Diag(CtorExpr->getLocation(),
+
@@ -12075,6 +12075,9 @@ def note_unsafe_buffer_variable_fixit_together : Note<
"%select{|, and change %2 to safe types to make function %4 bounds-safe}3">;
def note_safe_buffer_usage_suggestions_disabled : Note<
"pass -fsafe-buffer-usage-suggestions to receive code
@@ -722,6 +722,11 @@ def FeatureStdExtSsaia
"'Ssaia' (Advanced Interrupt Architecture Supervisor "
"Level)", []>;
+def FeatureStdExtSmepmp
+: SubtargetFeature<"smepmp", "HasStdExtSmepmp", "true",
+
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78384
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -80,17 +80,17 @@ OutOfLineDefs::foo(int, int, int) {
// LINUX: define dso_local noundef i32 @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.S
// LINUX: define dso_local noundef i32 @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.R
// LINUX: define weak_odr ptr @_ZN13OutOfLineDefs3fooEiii.resolver()
-// LINUX: ret
https://github.com/evodius96 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78202
>From 8751417f4889a120193a604e2ea91627f3b064e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Phipps
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:24:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][CoverageMapping] Refactor when setting MC/DC
@@ -676,41 +679,25 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
return E->getOpcode() == BO_LAnd;
}
- /// Push an ID onto the corresponding RHS stack.
- void pushRHS(const BinaryOperator *E) {
-llvm::SmallVector = isLAnd(E) ? AndRHS : OrRHS;
-
ributzka wrote:
@jansvoboda11 gentle ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75530
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -482,5 +482,35 @@ ParsedTargetAttr
RISCVTargetInfo::parseTargetAttr(StringRef Features) const {
Ret.Tune = AttrString;
}
}
+
+ StringRef MCPU = this->getTargetOpts().CPU;
+ StringRef MTune = this->getTargetOpts().TuneCPU;
+
+ // attr-cpu override march only
@@ -482,5 +482,35 @@ ParsedTargetAttr
RISCVTargetInfo::parseTargetAttr(StringRef Features) const {
Ret.Tune = AttrString;
}
}
+
+ StringRef MCPU = this->getTargetOpts().CPU;
+ StringRef MTune = this->getTargetOpts().TuneCPU;
+
+ // attr-cpu override march only
@@ -482,5 +482,35 @@ ParsedTargetAttr
RISCVTargetInfo::parseTargetAttr(StringRef Features) const {
Ret.Tune = AttrString;
}
}
+
+ StringRef MCPU = this->getTargetOpts().CPU;
+ StringRef MTune = this->getTargetOpts().TuneCPU;
+
+ // attr-cpu override march only
https://github.com/aeubanks closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73045
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jie Fu
Date: 2024-01-18T07:34:09+08:00
New Revision: 1b60ddd920e0caadfa85cc7013b559d6453d7e3e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b60ddd920e0caadfa85cc7013b559d6453d7e3e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b60ddd920e0caadfa85cc7013b559d6453d7e3e.diff
LOG:
In general, if the lambda is only used within its scope, I'd suggest
switching to a default ref capture "[&]" to reduce maintenance burden of
keeping the capture list up to date.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:09 PM Kazu Hirata via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Author: Kazu
Be good to have more description of "why" in commit messages in general
(the "what" is provided by the patch itself, especially when it's a small
one like this) - I guess this was to match naming conventions, that this
file generally already follows lower-first, etc.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:04
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73045
>From 0145020ef2a803ec797e42f95bacde05dc32eac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:01:04 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lld/ELF] Hint if R_X86_64_PC32 overflows and references
https://github.com/mshockwave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
>From b4e14471727c59634daeec58ff60b8c32c5f2961 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Min Hsu
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:28:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add support for Smepmp 1.0
Smepmp is a supervisor
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul)
Changes
We do not handle all architectures, llvm_unreachable is called after the
switch, so we can just break.
Fixes https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/19/builds/23702
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/sthibaul created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78520
We do not handle all architectures, llvm_unreachable is called after the
switch, so we can just break.
Fixes https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/19/builds/23702
>From
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sirraide
Date: 2024-01-17T15:09:31-08:00
New Revision: af0ee617fc5f69051297b0c23f8c818b20f02c3a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af0ee617fc5f69051297b0c23f8c818b20f02c3a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af0ee617fc5f69051297b0c23f8c818b20f02c3a.diff
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75883
>From 849b21f202f3c643c12f237920b137c3506996e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:48:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Support MSPropertyRefExpr as placement arg to
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Created as a draft, but I'd still love feedback on the approach, see if there
is anyone with ideas on how to manage the 'might take just a single attr, might
take a container + variadic list' functionality (as combining a default and a
variadic
@@ -1478,11 +1478,10 @@ static bool IsOverloadOrOverrideImpl(Sema ,
FunctionDecl *New,
return true;
// enable_if attributes are an order-sensitive part of the signature.
- for (specific_attr_iterator
- NewI = New->specific_attr_begin(),
- NewE =
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78518
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -43,80 +55,102 @@ class specific_attr_iterator {
mutable Iterator Current;
void AdvanceToNext() const {
-while (!isa(*Current))
+while (!isa(*Current))
++Current;
}
void AdvanceToNext(Iterator I) const {
-while (Current != I &&
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78518
Discussed elsewhere, it makes sense to have these functions be variadic. They
work as an 'or', that is, 'has*Attr' is "one of the set", and "get*Attr" means
"first of the set".
This is accomplished by
https://github.com/antangelo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: antangelo
Date: 2024-01-17T18:03:20-05:00
New Revision: 04a69a10f63dae3c03cdfa5e199d8ea4458398b5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04a69a10f63dae3c03cdfa5e199d8ea4458398b5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04a69a10f63dae3c03cdfa5e199d8ea4458398b5.diff
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Erich Keane
Date: 2024-01-17T15:01:53-08:00
New Revision: 3db5c058ff595e7d2f3a9df8c3bf265e54332a07
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3db5c058ff595e7d2f3a9df8c3bf265e54332a07
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3db5c058ff595e7d2f3a9df8c3bf265e54332a07.diff
@@ -2988,7 +2988,10 @@ static Address EmitX86_64VAArgFromMemory(CodeGenFunction
,
// AMD64-ABI 3.5.7p5: Step 10. Align l->overflow_arg_area upwards to
// an 8 byte boundary.
- uint64_t SizeInBytes = (CGF.getContext().getTypeSize(Ty) + 7) / 8;
+ uint64_t SizeInBytes =
Author: Michael Spencer
Date: 2024-01-17T14:40:00-08:00
New Revision: 0f67c7a0af271888930bb315c85d05d3936e265a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f67c7a0af271888930bb315c85d05d3936e265a
DIFF:
https://github.com/Bigcheese closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78513
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-01-17T14:39:28-08:00
New Revision: 5133a8f5590d74d9d15631742a3d84f978394dbd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5133a8f5590d74d9d15631742a3d84f978394dbd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5133a8f5590d74d9d15631742a3d84f978394dbd.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Samuel Thibault
Date: 2024-01-17T14:38:40-08:00
New Revision: 4fffb0401be10dc155e8b51321735f14f88c2589
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4fffb0401be10dc155e8b51321735f14f88c2589
DIFF:
efriedma-quic wrote:
There's no general rule that forbids taking the address of an always_inline
function. So if a user really wants to, they can call a mismatched
always_inline function anyway. Given that, making this a hard error seems a
bit dubious; it should probably be a warning
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77244
>From f4758993998e221cc41924d8ec9feb70f759937a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 09:47:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Spencer (Bigcheese)
Changes
Followup fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78513.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/PCH/gch-probe.c (+4)
https://github.com/Bigcheese created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78513
Followup fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
>From a12b3ab8663c591f66848a7e46620a79583f5045 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Spencer
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:27:03 -0800
Subject:
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73045
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ void elf::reportRangeError(uint8_t *loc, const Relocation
, const Twine ,
hint = "; references '" + lld::toString(*rel.sym) + '\'';
else if (auto *d = dyn_cast(rel.sym))
hint = ("; references section '" + d->section->name + "'").str();
+
+
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73045
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Bigcheese wrote:
Ah, looks like all the other gmodules tests have:
```
// Unsupported on AIX because we don't support the requisite "__clangast"
// section in XCOFF yet.
// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*}}-aix{{.*}}
```
I'll just add that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ on support follow.
``M``Supported
``Smaia``Supported
``Ssaia``Supported
+ ``Smepmp`` Supported
mshockwave wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const RISCVSupportedExtension SupportedExtensions[] = {
{"smaia", {1, 0}},
{"ssaia", {1, 0}},
+{"smepmp", {1, 0}},
mshockwave wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
https://github.com/mshockwave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
>From b4e14471727c59634daeec58ff60b8c32c5f2961 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Min Hsu
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:28:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Add support for Smepmp 1.0
Smepmp is a supervisor
Bigcheese wrote:
Yep, I'll take a look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
Nice! I wonder whether there is any documentation/procedure notes to facilitate
future updates, like: what files need to be updated?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77147
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-01-17T14:07:34-08:00
New Revision: 58b77b8581989a960bcb3bd088ac4a3e00c9fdb5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58b77b8581989a960bcb3bd088ac4a3e00c9fdb5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58b77b8581989a960bcb3bd088ac4a3e00c9fdb5.diff
https://github.com/pirama-arumuga-nainar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1347,7 +1347,24 @@
// RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/basic_android_tree/sysroot \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ANDROID-PTHREAD-LINK %s
// CHECK-ANDROID-PTHREAD-LINK-NOT: argument unused during compilation:
'-pthread'
-//
+
+/// Check -fandroid-pad-segment.
+//
https://github.com/pirama-arumuga-nainar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ on support follow.
``M``Supported
``Smaia``Supported
``Ssaia``Supported
+ ``Smepmp`` Supported
topperc wrote:
I think this list is aphabetized.
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const RISCVSupportedExtension SupportedExtensions[] = {
{"smaia", {1, 0}},
{"ssaia", {1, 0}},
+{"smepmp", {1, 0}},
topperc wrote:
This is required to be alphabetized. It won't pass lit tests if it isn't. Might
even fail
@@ -716,6 +716,13 @@ def FeatureStdExtSmaia
"AIA specifies for a hart, over all privilege levels.)",
[]>;
+def FeatureStdExtSmepmp
mshockwave wrote:
> Can we keep smaia and ssaia together since they come from the
mshockwave wrote:
> Needs to be added to RISCVUsage.rst, and probably a note in the release docs
> as well.
It's done now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77147
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mshockwave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
>From 84783b38744bc2bb46cb8d62db206864709a5e22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Min Hsu
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:28:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Add support for Smepmp 1.0
Smepmp is a supervisor
@@ -482,5 +482,35 @@ ParsedTargetAttr
RISCVTargetInfo::parseTargetAttr(StringRef Features) const {
Ret.Tune = AttrString;
}
}
+
+ StringRef MCPU = this->getTargetOpts().CPU;
+ StringRef MTune = this->getTargetOpts().TuneCPU;
+
+ // attr-cpu override march only
alanzhao1 wrote:
If we pass `-v` to Clang, we get the following include directories:
without this patch:
```
clang -cc1 version 18.0.0git based upon LLVM 18.0.0git default target
arm64-apple-darwin23.3.0
ignoring nonexistent directory
@@ -238,3 +239,236 @@ void init_capture_init_list() {
// CHECK: call {{.*}}dtor
// CHECK: }
}
+
+namespace P2718R0 {
shafik wrote:
Is it possible to also test the case where it does not clean up like in the
proposal:
```cpp
for (auto e : f2(g())) {} //
@@ -2312,12 +2312,31 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy
Parser::ParseDeclGroup(ParsingDeclSpec ,
bool IsForRangeLoop = false;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::colon, FRI->ColonLoc)) {
IsForRangeLoop = true;
+ EnterExpressionEvaluationContext ForRangeInitContext(
+
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78359
>From d7c8a6e0cb2289af939a90e82afbc6e35b08010c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:42:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [LinkerWrapper] Handle AMDGPU Target-IDs correctly when
@@ -30,6 +30,20 @@ using namespace llvm;
using namespace dwarf_linker;
using namespace dwarf_linker::classic;
+Expected> DwarfStreamer::createStreamer(
+const Triple , DWARFLinkerBase::OutputFileType FileType,
+raw_pwrite_stream , DWARFLinkerBase::TranslatorFuncTy
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
Before this patch, the DWARFLinker was the one responsible for creating the
streamer, which meant that both the classic and parallel implementation needed
to conform to the same interface. After this patch, the concrete
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77932
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
alanzhao1 wrote:
Here's what I did to repro:
`include.cc`:
```cpp
#include
```
Build clang:
```
$ cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=False
-DLLVM_CCACHE_BUILD=True -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang"
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;ARM;AArch64" ../llvm
$ ninja clang
```
I
101 - 200 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
